Clinical evaluation of a hybrid composite and a polyacid-modified composite resin in Class-II restorations in deciduous molars

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study, conducted in a dental practice was to evaluate the success rate of a hybrid composite material (TPH-Spectrum; Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and a polyacid-modified composite resin (Compoglass; Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in Class II restorations in primary molars after 1 year. A total of 190 restorations (96 with TPH-Spectrum and 94 with Compoglass) were inserted in 52 children. TPH-Spectrum was applied using the total etching technique, whereas Compoglass was inserted without acid etching prior to application of the bonding adhesive. The restorations were assessed according to the Ryge criteria, directly after placement and after 1 year. After 12 months, 6.4% of the Compoglass and 3.1% of the TPH-Spectrum restorations were clinically unacceptable and had to be renewed. The fillings with Compoglass revealed a tendency to lower evaluation scores with respect to color matching, cavosurface discoloration, anatomic form, margin integrity and caries assessment than the restorations with TPH-Spectrum. However, these differences were statistically not significant. The results of the present investigation show that, at least for a period of 1 year, both the hybrid composite TPH-Spectrum and the polyacid-modified composite resin Compoglass are suitable materials for restoration of deciduous molars. However, owing to the fewer treatment steps required for application of a polyacid-modified composite resin, this type of material may be more favorable for restoring primary molars.

Do adverse effects of dental materials exist? What are the consequences, and how can they be diagnosed and treated?

“… Ahlgren et al (2002), Ahlqwist et al (1999), Alanko et al (1996), Apostoli et al (2002), Archbold et al (2004), Athavale et al (2003), Attin et al (1998), Aw et al (2005), Bagedahl‐Strindlund et al (1997), Bailer et al (2001), Bangsi et al (1998), Bellinger et al (2006), Bergdahl et al (1998), Berglund & Molin (1996), Biocina‐Lukenda et al (2004), Blomgren et al (1996), Bratel et al (1996, 1997), Browning et al (1997), Casetta et al (2001), Chong & Pitt (2005), Dalen et al (2003a, 2003b), DeRouen et al (2006), Dohrn & Neuser (2001), Dunne & Abraham (2000), Dunsche et al (2003), Eden et al (2002), Faccioni et al (2003), Factor‐Litvak et al (2003), Fernandes et al (1998), Ganss et al (2000), Gottwald et al (2001), Grandjean et al (1997), Hayashi & Wilson (2003), Henningsson & Sundbom (1996), Herrstrom et al (1996, 1997), Hol et al (2001), Ibbotson et al (1996), Issa et al (2005), Jacobsen & Hensten‐Pettersen (2003), Janson et al (1998), Khamaysi et al (2006), Koch (1999), Kosugi et al (2003), Laeijendecker et al (2004), Laine et al (1997a, 1997b, 1999), Langworth et al (2002), Lindh et al (2001, 2002), Lindow et al (2003), Lopez‐Jornet et al (2004), Luglie et al (2005), Lundin & Rasmusson (2004), Lygre et al (2005), Magnin et al (2003), Malt et al (1997), Marcusson (1996, 1998, 1999), Mehulic et al (2005), Melchart et al (1998), Monaco et al (2001), Nerdrum et al (2004), Osborne & Summitt (1996), Östman et al (1996), Pecegueiro et al (1999), Prochazkova et al (2004), Räsänen et al (1996), Reitemeier et al (2002), Rodvall et al (1998), Santosh et al (1999), Schuster et al (2004), Schuurs et al (2000), Schwartz et al (1998), Stejskal et al (1996), Stenman & Grans (1997), Strömberg et al (1999), Sübay et al (2005), Thornhill et al (2003), Tsuruta et al (2001), Türkün & Aktener (2001), Vamnes et al (2000, 2004), Vilaplana & Romaguera (2000), Wong & Freeman (2003), Yiannias et al (2000). …”

“…Ahlgren et al (2002),Ahlqwist et al (1999),Alanko et al (1996),Apostoli et al (2002),Archbold et al (2004),Athavale et al (2003),Attin et al (1998),Aw et al (2005),Bagedahl-Strindlund et al (1997),Bailer et al (2001),Bangsi et al (1998), Bellinger et al (2006,Bergdahl et al (1998),Berglund & Molin (1996),Biocina-Lukenda et al (2004),Blomgren et al (1996),Bratel et al (1996Bratel et al ( , 1997,Browning et al (1997), Casetta et al (2001), Chong & Pitt (2005), Dalen et al (2003a, 2003b), DeRouen et al (2006), Dohrn & Neuser (2001), Dunne & Abraham (2000), Dunsche et al (2003), Eden et al (2002), Faccioni et al (2003), Factor-Litvak et al (2003), Fernandes et al (1998), Ganss et al (2000),Gottwald et al (2001),Grandjean et al (1997),Hayashi & Wilson (2003),Henningsson & Sundbom (1996),Herrstrom et al (1996Herrstrom et al ( , 1997,Hol et al (2001),Ibbotson et al (1996),Issa et al (2005),Jacobsen & Hensten-Pettersen (2003),Janson et al (1998),Khamaysi et al (2006),Koch (1999),Kosugi et al (2003),Laeijendecker et al (2004),Laine et al (1997aLaine et al ( , 1997bLaine et al ( , 1999,Langworth et al (2002),…”

Composite Resin or Compomer for the Restoration of Primary Molars: A Systematic Review.

“…After screening of titles and abstracts, 9 articles were suggested for full text reading (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Based on full texts reading, 4 articles (12-15) were excluded with reasons (Table 1).…”

Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

“…26,27,30- 36,40,42,45-53,56-60,65-67,71,73]; the FDI [61,83], Cvar and Ryge criteria[23,43,44,54], Pitts 1984[37], Frencken for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)[25,66,68],Mc Comb 2002[69,84],Duperon et al,1994 [55], adapted from Wood et al1993[70], and ART criterion [28,30,31,62] were also used. Some articles did not report the criteria used [14,27,…”

“…Some articles did not report the criteria used [14,27,37,41,46,48,51,56,58,64,72].Regarding the isolation of the operative eld, absolute isolation[14,23,24,26,27,33,35-37,46,48,51,56-58,63,69,70,73,77,78,82] or relative isolation[25,28,29,32,34,40,41,43,44,45,47,50,[53][54][55]59,60,64,66-68,74,76,79 − 8] was used, in both the intervention and control materials. The same study showed the use of absolute isolation in one of the evaluated restorative materials and relative isolation in another[30,31,57,61], whereas some articles did not report the type of isolation used in the clinical study[38,39,42,49,52,62,65,71,72,75,84].…”