2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of a Hepatitis C Virus whole-genome sequencing pipeline for genotyping and resistance testing

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study compared the amplification rates of two different sequencing platforms, namely partial genome sequencing by the Sanger method and full genome by Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS, from the perspective of massive screening and SARS-CoV-2 variants identification. There are some reports on the comparison between the NGS and the Sanger strategies for mutation screening and genotype identification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) [ 24 ] and hepatitis C virus (HCV) [ 25 ], but reports on the SARS-CoV-2 virus are limited. Hence, a variety of methods were developed to identify the variants of concern, such as amplicon-based whole or partial genome sequencing, multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays [ 26 ], S-gene target failure (SGTF) [ 27 ], screening single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assays [ 28 ], reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) [ 29 ], transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) [ 30 ], among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study compared the amplification rates of two different sequencing platforms, namely partial genome sequencing by the Sanger method and full genome by Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS, from the perspective of massive screening and SARS-CoV-2 variants identification. There are some reports on the comparison between the NGS and the Sanger strategies for mutation screening and genotype identification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) [ 24 ] and hepatitis C virus (HCV) [ 25 ], but reports on the SARS-CoV-2 virus are limited. Hence, a variety of methods were developed to identify the variants of concern, such as amplicon-based whole or partial genome sequencing, multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays [ 26 ], S-gene target failure (SGTF) [ 27 ], screening single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assays [ 28 ], reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) [ 29 ], transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) [ 30 ], among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%