2002
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-200212000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of a “Hand Pump” Vacuum Delivery Device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our success rate with the Re‐Usable OmniCup compares very favourably with the recent randomised and non‐randomised studies that have involved the use of the Kiwi OmniCup 7–10,18,19 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Our success rate with the Re‐Usable OmniCup compares very favourably with the recent randomised and non‐randomised studies that have involved the use of the Kiwi OmniCup 7–10,18,19 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This is a novel determinant of SGH formation as a result of attempted VAD, and is not well studied. Some authors have regarded VAD in which significant caput succedaneum is present as more complicated than others, and recommended the use of rigid cap devices . Nevertheless, in our study, the type of vacuum cap was not found to be associated with the formation of SGH.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…It is also a disposable unit which ensures sterility and avoids loss of function as a result of repeated use. Previous studies 7–9 conducted using the Kiwi Omnicup vacuum device reported different results on the efficacy and safety of its use. The present study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes between the Kiwi Omnicup and the Malmstrom metal cup in our unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%