2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10730-022-09474-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Ethics Consultation During the First COVID-19 Pandemic Surge at an Academic Medical Center: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Abstract: While a significant literature has appeared discussing theoretical ethical concerns regarding COVID-19, particularly regarding resource prioritization, as well as a number of personal reflections on providing patient care during the early stages of the pandemic, systematic analysis of the actual ethical issues involving patient care during this time is limited. This single-center retrospective cohort mixed methods study of ethics consultations during the first surge of the COVID 19 pandemic in Massachusetts be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer and COVID-19 had significantly longer times to consult than other diagnoses, consistent with the hypothesis that consults for these diagnoses were centered around end-of-life care due to the often terminal nature of cancer and the drawn-out hospital courses of patients with COVID-19. This was consistent with our data demonstrating that ethics consults for patients with COVID-19 diagnoses had among the highest rates of recommendations to make DNR or transition to comfort care, consistent with a prior study highlighting ethics consults related to end-of-life care in patients with COVID-19 [ 17 ]. However, more data is needed to draw significant conclusions on causal relationships between principal diagnosis and time to ethics consultation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cancer and COVID-19 had significantly longer times to consult than other diagnoses, consistent with the hypothesis that consults for these diagnoses were centered around end-of-life care due to the often terminal nature of cancer and the drawn-out hospital courses of patients with COVID-19. This was consistent with our data demonstrating that ethics consults for patients with COVID-19 diagnoses had among the highest rates of recommendations to make DNR or transition to comfort care, consistent with a prior study highlighting ethics consults related to end-of-life care in patients with COVID-19 [ 17 ]. However, more data is needed to draw significant conclusions on causal relationships between principal diagnosis and time to ethics consultation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, COVID-19 accounted for 18.2% of our consults from 2020–2021, which made it the most common diagnosis eliciting an ethics consult during those years. This was substantially lower than the 44.9% rate found during a study conducted at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–June 2020) [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A total of 119 [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 8...…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: , File S1: Excel spreadsheet containing complete metadata of references retrieved for description and Analysis of Research on Death and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Published in Nursing Journals Indexed in SCOPUS. (References [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying themes related to prognostic difficulty, challenges in visitor restrictions, and end-of-life scenarios, and the study provides practical insights. Nevertheless, the lack of a significant difference in consultation cases and reliance on retrospective data may constrain the generalizability of the findings [10]. Venturing into the controversial terrain of medical aid in dying, Kious BM conducted a philosophical evaluation of the impact of injustice on hard choices.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%