2016
DOI: 10.1177/0148607116657541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical, Ergonomic, and Economic Outcomes With Multichamber Bags Compared With (Hospital) Pharmacy Compounded Bags and Multibottle Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: The systematic literature review identified evidence of potential clinical, ergonomic, and economic benefits for MCBs compared with COBs and MBSs; however, methodological factors limited evidence quality. More prospective studies are required to corroborate existing evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Lipid emulsions can be given separately or as part of a total nutrient admixture. Total nutrient admixtures (including commercial multi‐chamber bags and pharmacy compounded bags) reduce line manipulations, infection risk, and cost compared with multi‐bottle systems . In addition, commercial multi‐chamber PN products are associated with fewer medication errors .…”
Section: Practical Handling Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipid emulsions can be given separately or as part of a total nutrient admixture. Total nutrient admixtures (including commercial multi‐chamber bags and pharmacy compounded bags) reduce line manipulations, infection risk, and cost compared with multi‐bottle systems . In addition, commercial multi‐chamber PN products are associated with fewer medication errors .…”
Section: Practical Handling Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State boards of pharmacy or other comparable professional regulatory bodies should hold accountable those who prepare PN admixtures, as this takes place in the pharmacy. Although multi‐bottle or 2‐in‐1 PN systems are used when stability concerns exist, TNA (whether commercial MCBs or custom compounded) reduces manipulations and resultant risk of infection and lowers costs compared with multi‐bottle PN systems . Among other advantages, commercial MCB products are also associated with fewer errors …”
Section: Ile Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, the potential disadvantage of using MCBs was the limited range of formulae available, but there are currently a large variety of standard MCBs on the market, except in some countries such as the United States. MCBs have certain advantages over hospital‐compounded PN such as a longer shelf life, manufacturer‐guaranteed stability, easy traceability, and clinical advantages mentioned previously . Moreover, standardization with MCBs appears to offer significant cost savings and reduced preparation time over compounding, as well as a reduction in errors related to PN preparation …”
Section: Standardization Of Pnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCBs contain macronutrients with or without electrolytes in separate compartments within the same bag. The various PN components are mixed by breaking a plastic seal, and vitamins, electrolytes, and trace elements can be added to the bag just prior to administration for further individualization if necessary 37 . This separation of the various PN components provides the MCBs a significantly longer shelf‐life of 12–24 months at room temperature 37 .…”
Section: Lipid Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%