2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04467-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical efficacy of lip repositioning technique and its modifications for the treatment of gummy smile: systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
16
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing that the lip repositioning technique, being classic or modified, has the objective of limiting muscle traction, reducing the deep of the upper vestibule with an expected average improvement of 3.4 mm ± 0.4 mm of GD [14], the results found in this study presented an average reduction of 4.42 mm in 6 months and 4.13 mm in 12 months (Table 3), which corroborate with the outcomes found with the application of the modified technique [16,18,30,38,39]. Likewise, literature shows that lip repositioning by using the classical technique is also able to achieve good results, with an average of 4.5 mm reduction in 6 months [16,32]. It is worth mentioning that the results obtained with the proposed technique had a high degree of satisfaction (Figure 10), which was similarly recorded by the patients of other studies by using other techniques of lip repositioning [16,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Knowing that the lip repositioning technique, being classic or modified, has the objective of limiting muscle traction, reducing the deep of the upper vestibule with an expected average improvement of 3.4 mm ± 0.4 mm of GD [14], the results found in this study presented an average reduction of 4.42 mm in 6 months and 4.13 mm in 12 months (Table 3), which corroborate with the outcomes found with the application of the modified technique [16,18,30,38,39]. Likewise, literature shows that lip repositioning by using the classical technique is also able to achieve good results, with an average of 4.5 mm reduction in 6 months [16,32]. It is worth mentioning that the results obtained with the proposed technique had a high degree of satisfaction (Figure 10), which was similarly recorded by the patients of other studies by using other techniques of lip repositioning [16,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is worth mentioning that the results obtained with the proposed technique had a high degree of satisfaction ( Figure 10 ), which was similarly recorded by the patients of other studies by using other techniques of lip repositioning [ 16 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations