2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6104-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography for decision of treatment strategy of gastric cancer

Abstract: EUS showed the high accuracy of 84.6% for T1a in lesion ≤ 2 cm in miniprobe EUS and 83.2% for EGC in lesion > 2 cm in conventional EUS, respectively. EUS can be a complementary diagnostic method to determine endoscopic or surgical treatment modality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
33
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have mentioned the sensitivity for SM2 or deeper EGC by EUS ranging from 66.3% to 84.0%, 17 , 20 , 21 similar to the findings in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have mentioned the sensitivity for SM2 or deeper EGC by EUS ranging from 66.3% to 84.0%, 17 , 20 , 21 similar to the findings in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A few number of EGCs with 0-IIb were included our study cohort, which was rarely seen in other studies, which might also affect the results. Several previous studies have reported ulceration as one of the risk factors for misdiagnosis, 4 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20 while both endoscopic and histological ulceration did not reach statistical significance in our study. Because histological findings were not suitable for predictive factors prior to treatment, we used endoscopic ulceration in logistic regression analysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations