2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/749479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine in Congolese Children with Acute Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Brazzaville

Abstract: The Republic of the Congo adopted artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in 2006: artesunate-amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine as the first-line and second-line drugs, respectively. The baseline efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine was evaluated between March and July 2006 in Brazzaville, the capital city of Congo. Seventy-seven children aged between 6 months and 10 years were enrolled in a nonrandomized study. The children were treated under supervision with 6 doses of artemether-lumefantrine and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P. falciparum is the usual cause of recrudescent infections as it can remain in blood stream due to ineffective treatment or host immunity. 8,16 In our patients, 10 (14.2 %) had an average of 11 prior malarial attacks treated within the previous 64 days (7-180 days) before the last presentation; nine of them had received their last malarial episode within the previous month (recrudescence). Three patients had received previous treatments of 3-day artemether-lumefantrine and two had received quinine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…P. falciparum is the usual cause of recrudescent infections as it can remain in blood stream due to ineffective treatment or host immunity. 8,16 In our patients, 10 (14.2 %) had an average of 11 prior malarial attacks treated within the previous 64 days (7-180 days) before the last presentation; nine of them had received their last malarial episode within the previous month (recrudescence). Three patients had received previous treatments of 3-day artemether-lumefantrine and two had received quinine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Per-protocol (PP) data were analysed using a pre-programmed Excel 7 spreadsheet provided by the Department of Global Malaria Programme, WHO (Geneva, Switzerland). This analysis method allows a direct comparison of data of the present study with those of previous studies [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In 2006, RoC adopted a new treatment policy for uncomplicated malaria with artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) as the first- and second-line drugs, respectively [ 15 ]. Three clinical studies were conducted before the decision: one randomized study in a rural area near Brazzaville [ 16 ] and two non-randomized studies in Brazzaville [ 17 , 18 ]. In these three published studies, non-co-formulated drugs were administered to symptomatic patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the period 1992 to 2005, before adoption of ACTs, six efficacy in vivo studies had been conducted, of which one was based on the 1973 WHO protocol for asymptomatic children to assess chloroquine efficacy [20], one on 14-day follow-up WHO protocol to assess chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) [22], and four on the current 28-day follow-up WHO protocol to evaluate therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine [24], SP [25], ASAQ, AL and AS + SP [26], AL and then ASAQ [28, 30]. The study based on the 1973 WHO protocol was conducted in 1993 in three southern regions of the country (Niari, Kouilou and Pool which included Brazzaville) and the authors reported that 7 days after the standard three-day treatment with chloroquine at 25 mg/kg, 20–60% of cases were still found to carry malaria parasites [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SP efficacy was further assessed in the second phase of this study and the cure rate of 100% was recorded [22]. However, studies carried out using the 28-day follow-up WHO protocol showed high level of treatment failure for chloroquine (95.7%) [24] and SP (31.2%) [25], while AL and ASAQ were found to be highly effective to treat uncomplicated malaria with the reported 28-day PCR-corrected cure rates of 96.9 [30] and 100% [26] for AL, and 94.4% [28] and 98.5% [26] for ASAQ. AS + SP, with the 28-day PCR-corrected cure rate of 90% was also effective but less than AL and ASAQ [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%