2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical efficacy and safety of limited internal fixation combined with external fixation for Pilon fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: PurposeTo compare the clinical efficacy and complications of limited internal fixation combined with external fixation (LIFEF) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of Pilon fracture.MethodsWe searched databases including Pubmed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library and China Biology Medicine disc for the studies comparing clinical efficacy and complications of LIFEF and ORIF in the treatment of Pilon fracture. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by the rate of nonunion, malunion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain ideal clinical outcomes, surgery should be planned to achieve anatomic reduction and stable fixation of the articular surface, tibial alignment restoration, minimal damage to skin tissue, and preserved blood circulation [3]. Various methods for Pilon fracture treatment have been reported, such as minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) [4], external fixation [5], open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) [6], and intramedullary interlocking nails [7]. However, when these classical strategies are adopted to treat high-force Pilon fracture with associated soft tissue damage, it is difficult to obtain the optimal result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain ideal clinical outcomes, surgery should be planned to achieve anatomic reduction and stable fixation of the articular surface, tibial alignment restoration, minimal damage to skin tissue, and preserved blood circulation [3]. Various methods for Pilon fracture treatment have been reported, such as minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) [4], external fixation [5], open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) [6], and intramedullary interlocking nails [7]. However, when these classical strategies are adopted to treat high-force Pilon fracture with associated soft tissue damage, it is difficult to obtain the optimal result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management of these fractures present numerous challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon, particularly for the Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO type C3 pilon fracture which represents severely comminuted fractures with impaction of the distal tibia. [4] Various methods for the pilon fracture reconstruction have been reported, including minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), [5] external xation, [6] open reduction and internal xation (ORIF), [7] and intramedullary interlocking nails. [8] For cases combined with a risk of soft tissue and osseous sepsis, reconstructive techniques included early xation, upgrading, primary arthrodesis, staged sequential posterior and anterior xation, acute shortening, and trans-syndesmotic bular plating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods for the pilon fracture reconstruction have been reported, including minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) [6], external xation [7], open reduction and internal xation (ORIF) [8], and intramedullary interlocking nails [9]. For cases combined with a risk of soft tissue and osseous sepsis, reconstructive techniques included early xation, upgrading, primary arthrodesis, staged sequential posterior and anterior xation, acute shortening, and trans-syndesmotic bular plating [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%