2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10156-010-0030-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical efficacy and safety of cefepime in febrile neutropenic patients with lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[70][71][72] Cefepime, for example, has been extensively studied in patients with febrile neutropenia and is widely considered a first-line drug for empiric therapy. [73][74][75] Still, it is conceivable that patients with febrile neutropenia are at risk for acquisition of MDR gram-negative organisms because of immunosuppression, repeated hospital admissions, previous exposure to antibiotics, previous colonization or infection with a resistant pathogen, local hospital epidemiology, and presence of intravascular devices. At a minimum, factors associated with acquisition of MDR gramnegative bacilli should be considered before starting empiric monotherapy.…”
Section: Adequate Initial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[70][71][72] Cefepime, for example, has been extensively studied in patients with febrile neutropenia and is widely considered a first-line drug for empiric therapy. [73][74][75] Still, it is conceivable that patients with febrile neutropenia are at risk for acquisition of MDR gram-negative organisms because of immunosuppression, repeated hospital admissions, previous exposure to antibiotics, previous colonization or infection with a resistant pathogen, local hospital epidemiology, and presence of intravascular devices. At a minimum, factors associated with acquisition of MDR gramnegative bacilli should be considered before starting empiric monotherapy.…”
Section: Adequate Initial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the severity of illness and CRP can be used to predict whether the FN will be refractory, then these patients can be treated more successfully by an agent which is most likely to provide a cure (broad-spectrum antibiotics including carbapenem). The other patients whose infection should respond to conventional agents should be treated with other drugs to prevent the development of bacteria resistant to broad-spectrum antibiotics including carbapenem [15,16]. However, the superiority of carbapenem has not been confirmed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…What type of antimicrobial agent should be used is yet to be determined. We investigated the role of intravenous antibiotics in FN in patients with lung cancer in past (9) , (10) , (11) . We currently investigated the role of oral antibiotics, STFX in low-risk FN patients with lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%