Clinical Effects of Mercury in Conservative Dentistry: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

Background and Purpose. Following the new directives of the European Union, which foresee the amalgam ban, the debate on its hypothetical toxicity has started again. So, the aim of this systematic review is to definitively evaluate the eventual effects of the exposure to Hg in adults and children with and without dental amalgam fillings measuring the Hg concentration in various biological fluids. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in four electronic databases (Ovid via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL) including all available randomised controlled trials published in the last 15 years comparing the use of dental amalgam with composite resins in humans with a follow-up period of at least one year. The primary outcome was the Hg concentration in biological fluids (urine, hair, blood, and saliva) with the aim of assessing their reliability as biomarkers of Hg exposure. The risk of bias was assessed through the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the overall quality of evidence through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system. The results of the meta-analysis were expressed using a random-effects model, and their power was assessed through the trial sequential analysis (TSA). Results. From the initial 2555 results, only 6 publications were included in the review: five were considered as having high risk of bias, whereas one as having moderate risk. Only two articles were eligible for quantitative analysis. The meta-analysis gathered data from 859 patients but was nevertheless not significant (p = 0.12). The TSA confirmed this evidence revealing that it was due to a lack of statistical power since the required information size (RIS) threshold is not reached. Conclusions. The existing evidence revealed that there are not enough data to support the hypothesis that restorations with dental amalgam can cause nephrotoxicity when compared with composite resins restorations.

Is Dental Amalgam a Higher Risk Factor rather than Resin-Based Restorations for Systemic Conditions? A Systematic Review

“…The results of this systematic review are in accordance with a recent similar review that came to the same conclusions when asking the scientific community for more RCTs on the relationships between dental amalgam, resin-based materials, and health concerns [ 45 ].…”

Influence of Commonly Used Endodontic Irrigants on the Setting Time and Metal Composition of Various Base Endodontic Sealers

“…One of the significant findings in the present study was that AH Plus did not show any Hg (0.00 ppm) on interaction with endodontic irrigants; in 2% CHX (0.93 ppm), 3% NaOCl (1.54 ppm), and 17% EDTA (1.96 ppm), this element was seen to be present. Elemental mercury has been used for a considerable period of time for conservative procedures in the form of amalgam restoration, though recent evidence suggests that there is no correlation of toxicity issues such as nephrotoxicity to occur among individuals [ 46 ]. These results may not follow pertaining to endodontics since endodontic sealers have direct contact with periapical tissues and host cells and can have a have a direct effect on the cells; this is a topic for future research.…”

Experimental characterization and finite element investigation of SiO2 nanoparticles reinforced dental resin composite

“…It became evident that using mercury-containing composites or other inappropriate treatment materials may cause pernicious side effects on health, such as heart diseases and arthritis 3 . This fact stimulated the search for safer alternative materials 4 , 5 .…”