2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00554.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical effects of an essential oil solution used as a coolant during ultrasonic root debridement

Abstract: Essential oil solutions do not offer a clinical benefit over water when used as a coolant during ultrasonic root debridement for the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Howbeit, the essential oil group, showed significant reduction in BOP scores compared with the other groups at 1 month. In a similar study by Cosyn et al (41), 35 chronic periodontitis patients underwent ultrasonic root debridement with either water or essential oil as coolant. After a 3-month period, despite the significant clinical improvements in both groups, no statistically significant inter-group difference was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Howbeit, the essential oil group, showed significant reduction in BOP scores compared with the other groups at 1 month. In a similar study by Cosyn et al (41), 35 chronic periodontitis patients underwent ultrasonic root debridement with either water or essential oil as coolant. After a 3-month period, despite the significant clinical improvements in both groups, no statistically significant inter-group difference was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Cosyn et al. ), and the other papers did not provide details on smoking habits. Information on procedures such as use of anaesthesia, duration of instrumentation, subsequent use of rubber cups for polishing, follow‐up supportive periodontal care, instructions regarding oral hygiene products, and additional (temporary) use of chemical mouthwash was sparsely reported in the included studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foi observado que o grupo Pincel apresentou menor perda óssea que o grupo Clorexidina provavelmente pelo menor desvio padrão observado.. Já na comparação intra-grupo, não houve progressão significativa da perda óssea radiográfica nos grupos Controle e Clorexidina de 7 a 21 dias, não se observando radiograficamente a eficácia da clorexidina 0,12% em inibir a progressão da DP (Cosyn et al, 2013;Zanatta & Rösing, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified