2020
DOI: 10.2217/rme-2020-0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Effectiveness of Anorganic Bovine-Derived Hydroxyapatite Matrix/Cell-Binding Peptide Grafts for Regeneration of Periodontal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Aim: To ascertain clinical effectiveness of anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide (ABM/P-15) for regeneration of periodontal defects. Materials & methods: Electronic databases (National Library of Medicine [Medline by PubMed], Cochrane Library [Wiley], CINAHL [EBSCO] and Medline [EBSCO]) were systematically searched up to December 2019. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing ABM/P-15 grafts to conventional surgery for intrabony and gingival recession defects were incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall meta-analysis showed no additional benefits of NcHA over other BGs, demonstrating comparable results of CAL gain, PPD reduction and REC increase between both test (NcHA) and control (other BGs) groups. This is in disagreement with a systematic review that demonstrated beneficial effects of a BG (anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide graft) rather than the OFD, in terms of CAL gain and PPD reduction [ 63 ]. However, in the subgroup analysis (NcHA versus synthetic BGs), only REC change demonstrated statistically significant results in favour of synthetic BGs, rather than NcHA grafts ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall meta-analysis showed no additional benefits of NcHA over other BGs, demonstrating comparable results of CAL gain, PPD reduction and REC increase between both test (NcHA) and control (other BGs) groups. This is in disagreement with a systematic review that demonstrated beneficial effects of a BG (anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide graft) rather than the OFD, in terms of CAL gain and PPD reduction [ 63 ]. However, in the subgroup analysis (NcHA versus synthetic BGs), only REC change demonstrated statistically significant results in favour of synthetic BGs, rather than NcHA grafts ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…In the realm of periodontal regeneration, innovative therapies and adjuncts to established treatment methods are constantly being researched and presented [ 59 ]. Several treatment approaches for periodontal regeneration have been utilised, including barrier membranes [ 60 , 61 ], BGs [ 62 , 63 ], EMD [ 64 , 65 , 66 ], and growth factors [ 67 ]. In humans, there is considerable histological evidence of BGs, indicating periodontal unit regeneration with new cementum, alveolar bone, and a functioning periodontal ligament [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research is being carried out in the field of bone regeneration for periodontal defects. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures [ 52 , 53 , 54 ], the use of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ], growth factors (GF) [ 59 , 60 , 61 ], BMPs [ 62 ], platelet-rich plasma/fibrin (PRP/PRF) [ 63 , 64 , 65 ], and various bone grafting procedures [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ] have been extensively described in the literature. Autogenous material obtained from the same individual is always considered the gold standard because of its high osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive potential [ 70 ].…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Auto-bgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in conventional periodontal surgery, the use of the anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide (ABM/P-15) graft has a helpful effect in a therapeutic way for periodontal regeneration as well as open flap debridement (OFD) and coronally positioned flap (CPF). But, it should be compared with other regeneration techniques, and the longevity of the materials should be studied more [ 146 ].…”
Section: Periodontal Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%