2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical effect of imatinib added to intensive combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
1
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
84
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13] Median time to neutrophil recovery of at least 1.10 9 /l was 21 days (range, 1-43) and median time to platelet recovery of at least 50.10 9 /l was 16 days (range, 1-65).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11][12][13] Median time to neutrophil recovery of at least 1.10 9 /l was 21 days (range, 1-43) and median time to platelet recovery of at least 50.10 9 /l was 16 days (range, 1-65).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 High CHR rates are also achieved in newly diagnosed Ph þ ALL using imatinib at 600 mg daily together with an intensive four drugs-based induction chemotherapy. 12,13 Here, we report the results of a multicenter pilot study designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and the tolerance of high-dose imatinib associated with a nonintensive sequential vincristine and dexamethasone chemotherapy schedule (Dexamethasone, Imatinib and Vincristine, DIV regimen) in a series of 31 patients with LBC and relapsed or resistant Ph þ ALL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, adjustments for potential confounders in the comparisons with the pre-imatinib cohort from a nationwide registry allow unbiased estimates to be made, at least in Japan. Given the evidence for a substantial impact of imatinib in Ph þ ALL patients, 7,[14][15][16] it is unrealistic to conduct a prospective study comparing treatments with or without imatinib. Hence, a retrospective cohort design could be suboptimal to address the key questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of Ph þ ALL has changed dramatically since the introduction of imatinib and 490% of patients have achieved CR, 7,14,15 and allows SCT to be performed in a substantial proportion of patients in major or complete molecular remission. 8,[16][17][18] Actually, in the imatinib cohort, 97 of 100 patients (97%) achieved CR and 60 (60%) could receive allo-HSCT in their first CR. Several studies reported improved OS rates compared with that in the pre-imatinib era by incorporation of imatinib-based therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, patients with Ph-positive ALL are now treated with imatinib-containing regimens in specific studies that appear to highly improve the outcome of these high-risk patients. [41][42][43] Otherwise, the choice between ASCT or chemotherapy is still open. One may consider that the use of ASCT significantly reduces the total duration of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%