2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical effect of computer generated physician reminders in health screening in primary health care—a controlled clinical trial of preventive services among the elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior research has shown that health care providers can impact their patients' decisions to undergo cancer screening by raising the issue during appointments. 20,21 Electronic reminder systems have been used with success in improving cancer screening and preventive services in ambulatory care clinics, [22][23][24][25] particularly in academic settings. 26 We plan to develop and implement an educational program and an electronic reminder system to improve HBV risk assessment and screening in our academic general medicine clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research has shown that health care providers can impact their patients' decisions to undergo cancer screening by raising the issue during appointments. 20,21 Electronic reminder systems have been used with success in improving cancer screening and preventive services in ambulatory care clinics, [22][23][24][25] particularly in academic settings. 26 We plan to develop and implement an educational program and an electronic reminder system to improve HBV risk assessment and screening in our academic general medicine clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys of medical records have demonstrated suboptimal level of hypertension control despite adequate access to health care providers (15,16,56). Acceptance of suboptimal blood pressure control by providers appears to contribute to low hypertension control rates (46,76,95,133,175). Many providers are not familiar with national guidelines (78).…”
Section: Barriers To Hypertension Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…more recently, researchers in North America (Gill et al 2006;Ornstein et al 2007) have begun to use these data for research. Worldwide, specific research uses of EmR data include helping to improve primary healthcare for patients with chronic conditions such as diabetes (Gill et al 2006;Ornstein et al 2007;Kupersmith et al 2007) and hypertension (mitchell et al 2005), as well as to enhance preventive care (Toth-Pal et al 2004;vogt et al 2007), to examine relationships between symptoms and ensuing disease in patients ( Jones et al 2007) and to support family concordance studies (Hippisley-Cox et al 2002). However, significant challenges remain in using EmR data for research (Lobach and detmer 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from the literature suggests that EmRs can improve practice by providing point-of-care information to assist clinical decision-making (Bates et al 1999;Garg et al 2005) and by giving feedback on standards of care leading to improved patient management (mitchell et al 2005;Toth-Pal et al 2004;vogt et al 2007). EmRs can help policy making by providing evidence about primary care workload community needs, which are expressed as health services utilization (Okkes et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%