2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical discussion of Medical Aid-in-Dying: minimizing harms and ensuring informed choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They underscored the importance of hope in alleviating suffering and suggested ongoing and additional services and supports to MAiD MI-SUMC applicants throughout the assessment period. This perspective aligns with literature suggesting that a MAiD request may be at first considered as “a cry for help”, and with a two-track approach focusing both “on the life track” by engaging in ongoing treatment, and on the “death track” by assessing MAiD eligibility [ 22 , 23 , 44 ]. Similarly, in keeping with prior research with patients with other health conditions and their families, participants stressed the importance of holistic, interdisciplinary assessments, and the opportunity to tell their story and exercise autonomous health decision making [ 25 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They underscored the importance of hope in alleviating suffering and suggested ongoing and additional services and supports to MAiD MI-SUMC applicants throughout the assessment period. This perspective aligns with literature suggesting that a MAiD request may be at first considered as “a cry for help”, and with a two-track approach focusing both “on the life track” by engaging in ongoing treatment, and on the “death track” by assessing MAiD eligibility [ 22 , 23 , 44 ]. Similarly, in keeping with prior research with patients with other health conditions and their families, participants stressed the importance of holistic, interdisciplinary assessments, and the opportunity to tell their story and exercise autonomous health decision making [ 25 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Although there was widespread agreement on the value of clinicians responding to patient-initiated MAiD MI-SUMC questions using a non-judgmental stance, participants voiced conflicting views on clinicians introducing MAiD in goals of care discussions with persons with a mental illness. In balancing potential harms with the right to self-determination, the Canadian Association of MAiD Assessors and Providers supports informing eligible patients about MAiD, highlighting the value of informed consent, the importance of patient autonomy, and the role of clinicians as gatekeepers of clinical information [ 44 ]. Given participant concerns about clinician-initiated MAiD MI-SUMC conversations, care providers will need clear guidance on how best to promote unbiased MAiD MI-SUMC information sharing and person-centred, respectful and inclusive goals of care discussions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasise this must be done sensitively, within the law, and guided by good clinical practice about end-oflife care discussions. 18…”
Section: Advance Care Planning Practices and Systems Need To Recognis...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where it is legally possible to raise voluntary assisted dying (Box 1) and clinically appropriate, informing patients of all possible end‐of‐life choices would facilitate decisions that align with the values, beliefs and preferences at the heart of advance care planning. We emphasise this must be done sensitively, within the law, and guided by good clinical practice about end‐of‐life care discussions 18 …”
Section: Advance Care Planning Practices and Systems Need To Recognis...mentioning
confidence: 99%