2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 869 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While targeting M1 CL with 1 Hz rTMS may be indicated in some individuals with specific lesion profiles, 28 group-level data in patients with stroke often fails to demonstrate evidence of hyperexcitability in M1 CL . 29 Targeting M1 of the affected corticospinal tract using excitatory rTMS may be more appropriate in patients with sufficient residual corticospinal tract integrity. Our sample population of participants with mixed lesion location and extent included ≈30% with lesions of the brainstem.…”
Section: Considerations For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While targeting M1 CL with 1 Hz rTMS may be indicated in some individuals with specific lesion profiles, 28 group-level data in patients with stroke often fails to demonstrate evidence of hyperexcitability in M1 CL . 29 Targeting M1 of the affected corticospinal tract using excitatory rTMS may be more appropriate in patients with sufficient residual corticospinal tract integrity. Our sample population of participants with mixed lesion location and extent included ≈30% with lesions of the brainstem.…”
Section: Considerations For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that ALS is a neurodegenerative disorder of upper and lower motor neurons, neurophysiological measures have emerged as important diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Specifically, the presence of cortical hyperexcitability reliably differentiates ALS from neuromuscular mimicking disorders and is an adverse prognostic biomarker 11 . At a lower motor neuron level, reduction of split hand and neurophysiological index appear to be useful diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in ALS 12–14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a pathophysiological level, cortical hyperexcitability has been consistently identified as an important pathogenic biomarker of ALS, 11 correlating with lower motor neuron dysfunction and degeneration as reflected by conventional CMAP amplitudes 22,23 Cortical hyperexcitability has also been associated with disease progression and an adverse prognosis in ALS 24–26 . Given the pathogenic importance of cortical hyperexcitability in ALS, correlating FFP‐CMAP amplitudes with neurophysiological measures of cortical hyperexcitability, such as short interval intracortical inhibition (a biomarker of cortical inhibitory circuits), could provide novel insights into ALS pathogenesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of correlation may relate to lower sensitivity of conventional nerve conduction studies in detecting specific sites of peripheral nerve dysfunction. Tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials38 and conus stimulation utilizing a large 20-cm-diameter Magnetic Augmented Translumbosacral Stimulation (MATS) coil39 may help clarify the role of proximal peripheral nerve segment dysfunction in CIDP related lower limb tremor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%