2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our solution was to group according to no vascular genesis (AD), or vascular genesis with possible supplementary (primary degenerative) pathogenesis. Thus, we included MD in the diagnosis of VaD, a practice previously suggested by others [42] . We believe that the results we present, with the clear-cut neuropsychological differences, speak in favor of the validity of such a diagnostic grouping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our solution was to group according to no vascular genesis (AD), or vascular genesis with possible supplementary (primary degenerative) pathogenesis. Thus, we included MD in the diagnosis of VaD, a practice previously suggested by others [42] . We believe that the results we present, with the clear-cut neuropsychological differences, speak in favor of the validity of such a diagnostic grouping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some evidence suggests that particularly in elderly patients there is considerable overlap between AD and VaD [13,14]. This coexistence of both pathologies is named mixed dementia (MD) and vascular pathology occurs in from 25% to more than 50% of AD cases [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflex asymmetry, hemi-motor dysfunction and dysarthria are the most common finding but many different neurological signs or symptoms can present. 21,22 Of the 12 cases referred for MRI or Brain SPECT, 11 ended up having neurological illnesses. It is unlikely that such a high positive yield is a reflection of the clinician's diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%