1991
DOI: 10.1159/000107199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract: There are a number of ways in which a clinical diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer type can be made – the application of clinical criteria is the commonest but ancillary techniques such as neuroimaging, peripheral markers and neurophysiological investigations are helpful. The NINCDS/ADRDA criteria are the most consistent in correctly predicting, during life, who will have the neuropathological findings of Alzheimer''s disease and as such represent the gold standard for clinical diagnosis. Platelet membrane … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of specific genetic or biological markers associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) would be a tremendous advance in the research and clinical management of this form of dementia. It would improve the clinical diagnostic accuracy (use of clinical diagnosis alone can lead to a misdiagnosis in 20%-30% of cases in the non-LD (learning disability) population, 1 aid early detection, improve quality of treatment trials, increase our knowledge of the pathogenesis of the disorder and determine if AD is a specific brain disease or a generalised system disorder. Further, as a diagnosis of AD is often made by exclusion of other disorders; such a biological measure would be a 'positive' indicator of AD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of specific genetic or biological markers associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) would be a tremendous advance in the research and clinical management of this form of dementia. It would improve the clinical diagnostic accuracy (use of clinical diagnosis alone can lead to a misdiagnosis in 20%-30% of cases in the non-LD (learning disability) population, 1 aid early detection, improve quality of treatment trials, increase our knowledge of the pathogenesis of the disorder and determine if AD is a specific brain disease or a generalised system disorder. Further, as a diagnosis of AD is often made by exclusion of other disorders; such a biological measure would be a 'positive' indicator of AD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%