2007
DOI: 10.3201/eid1301.060718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Diagnosis and Geographic Distribution of Leptospirosis, Thailand

Abstract: We defined the positive predictive accuracy of a hospital-based clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis in 9 provinces across Thailand. Of 700 suspected cases, 143 (20%) were confirmed by laboratory testing. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis varied from 0% to 50% between the provinces and was highest during the rainy season. Most confirmed cases occurred in the north and northeast regions of the country.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
57
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28 However, in several studies reporting serologic surveys in local populations in Southeast Asia, serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae was not shown to be the dominant serogroup. [29][30][31][32] Leptospirosis was seen as multi-organ failure and a potentially life-threatening disease in many of our patients. This type of manifestation was significantly more common in patients presumptively infected with serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 However, in several studies reporting serologic surveys in local populations in Southeast Asia, serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae was not shown to be the dominant serogroup. [29][30][31][32] Leptospirosis was seen as multi-organ failure and a potentially life-threatening disease in many of our patients. This type of manifestation was significantly more common in patients presumptively infected with serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study in Thailand, the positive predictive accuracy of a hospital-based diagnosis of leptospirosis in nine provinces was low, with only 143 out of 700 (20%) suspected cases being confirmed by laboratory testing. The causes of illness in the remaining 80% of cases were not found 5 . Furthermore, routine laboratory data are generally nonspecific; either a normal differential white blood cell count or a predominance of polymorphonuclear leucocytes is generally seen in leptospirosis cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A diagnosis may be made on the basis of the clinical presentation and symptoms that show characteristics of the severe disease form together with a suggestive epidemiological history 3,4 . However, a clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis is often inaccurate because the disease shares clinical features with a range of other infectious diseases [5][6][7][8] . Some of these other viral and bacterial infections, including some arboviruses (e.g., dengue fever, Oropouche fever and yellow fever), Brazilian spotted fever, viral hepatitis and hantaviruses, are matters of public health concern in tropical countries and may be related to the misdiagnosis of leptospirosis 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we evaluated the analytic validity of an immunoglobulin M immunoblot (IgM-IB) assay for the diagnosis of acute leptospirosis. Using a mixture of local blood culture isolates (34,40,46), we identified several low-molecular-weight antigens that were recognized by antibodies in a high percentage of sera from patients with early disease. Inclusion of these low-molecular-weight antigens in the diagnostic criteria resulted in an IgM-IB test with superior sensitivity for diagnosis of acute leptospirosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%