2007
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afm014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical determinants of long-term quality of life after stroke

Abstract: Objectives: to determine factors that independently predict health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 1 and 3 years after stroke. Methods: subjects numbering 397, from a population-based register of first-ever strokes were assessed for HRQOL using the Short Form 36 (SF36) 1 year after stroke. Physical (PHSS) and mental health (MHSS) summary scores were derived from the eight domains of HRQOL in the SF36. Multivariate stepwise regression analyses were conducted to determine independent predictors of these scores; … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

13
133
5
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(43 reference statements)
13
133
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the literature in this area reports that the severity of the aphasia is one of the principal predictors to decrease the QOL post-stroke (23,(26)(27)(28) , which agrees with the data found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the literature in this area reports that the severity of the aphasia is one of the principal predictors to decrease the QOL post-stroke (23,(26)(27)(28) , which agrees with the data found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, other studies (9,28) show that part of the subjects indicate their QOL remained the same after the stroke. This difference can be explained by the reduced size of the sample in our study, and also, because it refers to a population of aphasics only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Extent of poststroke recovery varies with many patient-related factors (e.g., age at stroke onset, sex, handedness, socioeconomic status) and various stroke-and lesion-related factors (e.g., initial stroke severity, lesion size, stroke subtype, lesion location), but these factors have very limited predictive power for outcome (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). Even good predictors, including initial stroke severity and lesion volume, leave most of the variability in outcome unexplained (25)(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously referenced as a rare condition among the young adults, with an incidence of 5 to 10% 4.5 , in Brazil, In the last five years have identified a frequency which is close to 40% of young adults between those who had stroke 6 . In addition to the high mortality rate, it is considered as the most disabling of long-term diseases, impacting not only the patient but also their families 7 , and the social security and public system 8 . The growing number of young adults affected by stroke has increased the cost of disability benefits, greatly burdening the public health budget and being responsible for 40% of early retirements 8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stroke is a disabling disease 7 and the involvement of this active population will bring losses to social security, reaching a rate of 40% of early retirement 8 with a range of 40 to 93% of patients not returning to previous activity, requiring permanent removal from professional activities 11.27 28 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%