Abstract:Diagnostic errors are increasingly recognized as a source of preventable harm in medicine, yet little is known about their occurrence in dentistry. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of clinical dental faculty members' perceptions of diagnostic errors, types of errors that may occur, and possible contributing factors. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with ten domain experts at one U.S. dental school in May-August 2016 about their perceptions of diagnostic errors and their … Show more
“…Further, this finding is supported by previous studies where delays in referral by clinicians are a huge contributing factor to delayed diagnosis of oral cancer [ 20 , 28 , 29 ]. Oral cancer and periodontal diseases were also on the top of the missed and delayed diagnosed dental conditions reported by Nikdel et al [ 7 ]. Regression analysis showed that Al-Azhar and Governmental universities staff reported that oral mucosal lesions were the most diagnostic errors conditions followed by pulp therapy related conditions, disagreeing with the staff of Private universities who reported the pulp therapy related conditions to be the most common diagnostic errors conditions, more data regarding various aspects related to teaching and assessment methods and the contents of both subjects is needed to explain this observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two of our study participants were teaching staff at the bio-dental materials department, which is an academic department, however, they do have a private clinic. General dentists were excluded in accordance with Nikdel et al, 2018 as dentists in dental centers or private offices who experience an error-in the best of cases, they learn from it, but in most cases, they will try to conceal it from other professionals [ 7 ]. This means that a bulk of information on errors will be lost and cannot be properly studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third part of our survey addressed the contributing factors that might cause dental diagnostic errors, in addition to the known system-related and cognitive-related factors, Nikdel et al added patient-related factors [ 7 ]. In our questionnaire, we didn’t include a direct choice regarding patient-related factors, as we believe that understanding the patient complaint correctly and proper communication with the patient is a skill and cognitive ability of the dentist, further, and in support of this belief, none of our participants pointed out to patient-related factors in other possible causes of diagnostic errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was designed by the authors to cover the study objectives, guided by previously published relevant studies [ 3 , 7 ]. Afterward, an independent committee including experts in community medicine, oral medicine, biostatistics, oral public health, epidemiology, and healthcare quality reviewed the questionnaire draft to assess the face and content validity.…”
Section: Questionnaire Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite numerous efforts and initiatives aiming to promote patients’ safety by reducing the occurrence of diagnostic errors, in dentistry, many patients suffer harm in dental clinics [ 7 , 8 ]. Previous reports showed that there is an increase in dental complaints and negligence claims and 9% of these claims are related to diagnostic errors [ 9 ].…”
Background
Diagnostic errors is a known problem in healthcare practice. Data on diagnostic errors in the dental field are extremely lacking. The objective of the study is to explore the perception of dental teaching staff about the prevalence of dental diagnostic errors in Egypt, identify the most commonly misdiagnosed dental conditions and point out the contributing factors and levels of patient harm.
Methods
A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted on 151 dental teaching staff of Egyptian governmental and private universities. The questionnaire was distributed electronically via social media and messaging apps to dental staff members with at least five years of clinical experience to assess their opinion regarding the study objectives. Results were collected and statistically analyzed.
Results
94.7% of participants believed that diagnostic errors represent an urgent problem, lecturers believed by 2.703 folds more than professors that diagnostic errors are an urgent problem The percentage of diagnostic errors was estimated to be < 20% and 20–40% by more than 90% of participants. The most commonly misdiagnosed conditions were oral mucosal lesions (83.4%), followed by temporomandibular joint and periodontal conditions (58.9%) for each. More than half of the participants (60.9%) believe that medical education methodology is one of the factors that lead to dental diagnosis errors. For the impact of errors on patients, 53% of participants reported moderate impacts followed by minor impact (37.7%) while 4.6% reported no impact and the same percentage reported major impact.
Conclusion
This study with statistically significant results reported that dental diagnostic errors are frequent and need to be approached. Oral mucosal lesions, periodontal and temporomandibular joint diseases represent areas that include the most commonly seen errors. Further, besides the lack of resources, the dental education system and lack of proper training are the main causes of this problem.
“…Further, this finding is supported by previous studies where delays in referral by clinicians are a huge contributing factor to delayed diagnosis of oral cancer [ 20 , 28 , 29 ]. Oral cancer and periodontal diseases were also on the top of the missed and delayed diagnosed dental conditions reported by Nikdel et al [ 7 ]. Regression analysis showed that Al-Azhar and Governmental universities staff reported that oral mucosal lesions were the most diagnostic errors conditions followed by pulp therapy related conditions, disagreeing with the staff of Private universities who reported the pulp therapy related conditions to be the most common diagnostic errors conditions, more data regarding various aspects related to teaching and assessment methods and the contents of both subjects is needed to explain this observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two of our study participants were teaching staff at the bio-dental materials department, which is an academic department, however, they do have a private clinic. General dentists were excluded in accordance with Nikdel et al, 2018 as dentists in dental centers or private offices who experience an error-in the best of cases, they learn from it, but in most cases, they will try to conceal it from other professionals [ 7 ]. This means that a bulk of information on errors will be lost and cannot be properly studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third part of our survey addressed the contributing factors that might cause dental diagnostic errors, in addition to the known system-related and cognitive-related factors, Nikdel et al added patient-related factors [ 7 ]. In our questionnaire, we didn’t include a direct choice regarding patient-related factors, as we believe that understanding the patient complaint correctly and proper communication with the patient is a skill and cognitive ability of the dentist, further, and in support of this belief, none of our participants pointed out to patient-related factors in other possible causes of diagnostic errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was designed by the authors to cover the study objectives, guided by previously published relevant studies [ 3 , 7 ]. Afterward, an independent committee including experts in community medicine, oral medicine, biostatistics, oral public health, epidemiology, and healthcare quality reviewed the questionnaire draft to assess the face and content validity.…”
Section: Questionnaire Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite numerous efforts and initiatives aiming to promote patients’ safety by reducing the occurrence of diagnostic errors, in dentistry, many patients suffer harm in dental clinics [ 7 , 8 ]. Previous reports showed that there is an increase in dental complaints and negligence claims and 9% of these claims are related to diagnostic errors [ 9 ].…”
Background
Diagnostic errors is a known problem in healthcare practice. Data on diagnostic errors in the dental field are extremely lacking. The objective of the study is to explore the perception of dental teaching staff about the prevalence of dental diagnostic errors in Egypt, identify the most commonly misdiagnosed dental conditions and point out the contributing factors and levels of patient harm.
Methods
A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted on 151 dental teaching staff of Egyptian governmental and private universities. The questionnaire was distributed electronically via social media and messaging apps to dental staff members with at least five years of clinical experience to assess their opinion regarding the study objectives. Results were collected and statistically analyzed.
Results
94.7% of participants believed that diagnostic errors represent an urgent problem, lecturers believed by 2.703 folds more than professors that diagnostic errors are an urgent problem The percentage of diagnostic errors was estimated to be < 20% and 20–40% by more than 90% of participants. The most commonly misdiagnosed conditions were oral mucosal lesions (83.4%), followed by temporomandibular joint and periodontal conditions (58.9%) for each. More than half of the participants (60.9%) believe that medical education methodology is one of the factors that lead to dental diagnosis errors. For the impact of errors on patients, 53% of participants reported moderate impacts followed by minor impact (37.7%) while 4.6% reported no impact and the same percentage reported major impact.
Conclusion
This study with statistically significant results reported that dental diagnostic errors are frequent and need to be approached. Oral mucosal lesions, periodontal and temporomandibular joint diseases represent areas that include the most commonly seen errors. Further, besides the lack of resources, the dental education system and lack of proper training are the main causes of this problem.
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Every health organization aims to provide high-quality service and promote patient safety. However, achieving these goals can be challenging in many healthcare systems around the world. In dentistry, dentists can face medicolegal issues, which can be overcome by exploring the reasons for dental malpractice litigation. In this study, we aim to identify the most common causes and outcomes of dental malpractice litigation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a retrospective study. We reviewed all closed cases in dentistry as decided by the Medico-Legal Committee of Saudi Arabia in the Riyadh region over a period of 5 years and 3 months, from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2019. Descriptive analysis was used to examine the phenomenon of dental malpractice claims. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 151 claims were analyzed. As per our findings, it was determined that the number of closed claims had increased, with the highest number of claims (35%) related to the prosthodontics specialty, followed by endodontics specialty (31%). The most common causes of litigation were failure to conduct the procedure properly (31.5%) and poor documentation (19.7%). With respect to litigation outcomes, 54% ended up with verdict in favor of the plaintiff. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> It was determined that there is a rising trend of malpractice litigation in the dentistry field; thus, measures should be taken to address these concerns.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.