Clinical Decision Support Tools for Selecting Interventions for Patients with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Purpose We aimed to identify and inventory clinical decision support (CDS) tools for helping front-line staff select interventions for patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders. Methods We used Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework which progresses through five stages: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting studies for analysis; (4) charting the data; and (5) collating, summarizing and reporting results. We considered computer-based, and other available tools, such as algorithms, care pathways, rules and models. Since this research crosses multiple disciplines, we searched health care, computing science and business databases. Results Our search resulted in 4605 manuscripts. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance. The reliability of the screening process was high with an average percentage of agreement of 92.3 %. Of the located articles, 123 were considered relevant. Within this literature, there were 43 CDS tools located. These were classified into 3 main areas: computer-based tools/questionnaires (n = 8, 19 %), treatment algorithms/models (n = 14, 33 %), and clinical prediction rules/classification systems (n = 21, 49 %). Each of these areas and the associated evidence are described. The state of evidentiary support for CDS tools is still preliminary and lacks external validation, head-to-head comparisons, or evidence of generalizability across different populations and settings. Conclusions CDS tools, especially those employing rapidly advancing computer technologies, are under development and of potential interest to health care providers, case management organizations and funders of care. Based on the results of this scoping review, we conclude that these tools, models and systems should be subjected to further validation before they can be recommended for large-scale implementation for managing patients with MSK disorders.

An Interactive Website for Whiplash Management (My Whiplash Navigator): Process Evaluation of Design and Implementation

“…Web-based tools such as computerized decision support systems are one of the most effective strategies to support the implementation of clinical pathways and guidelines, thereby improving HCP practice [24-26]. In musculoskeletal health, these tools are used to provide clinical information, guide triage, and match patients to appropriate resources and treatments [27]. These tools are shown to be effective in improving HCP practice in the management of conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and osteoarthritis [28,29].…”

Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review

“…Moreover, a recent study which explored the effectiveness of a decision-aid over usual care on patient satisfaction and physical outcomes in a sample of patients with non-specific low back pain found comparable satisfaction levels, but worse outcomes (pain/physical aspects) and lower cost-effectiveness for the intervention arm! [28] Considering that in musculoskeletal rehabilitation, decision-aids remain scarce and described to be in their developmental phase, they might be seen as premature to implement in clinical practice [29]. Furthermore, they are likely to remain scarce since we don't fully understand our own intervention effects.…”

Rehabilitation management of low back pain – it’s time to pull it all together!

“…Although the interview remains the main way to gather information about the relative contribution/presence of occupation-related elements, a very recent scoping review found interesting tools. 97 Among others, the Work Assessment Triage Tool 98 captures 18 variables related to injury duration, job, working status, and availability of modified work. According to the patient/therapist response, it suggests best work reintegration options.…”