2022
DOI: 10.1253/circrep.cr-21-0147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Course of Optical Coherence Tomography-Detected Lipid-Rich Coronary Plaque After Optimal Medical Therapy

Abstract: Background:The aim of this study was to evaluate optical coherence tomography (OCT)-detected lipid-rich coronary plaques (LRCPs) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) 10 months after optimal medical therapy (OMT). Methods and Results:Baseline OCT detected 28 LRCPs in non-culprit lesions. High-risk plaque features (HRPFs), such as positive remodeling, very low attenuation plaques, napkin-ring sign, and spotty calcification, were observed in 67.9%, 67.9%, 21.4%, and 64.3% of LRCPs, respectively, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CCTA-measured CACS is widely used for the quantitative evaluation of calcium burden [9] and prediction of coronary events [10,11], and is calculated based on regions with CT values ≥ 130 HU [9]. On the other hand, CPV is calculated by the total volume of regions with CT values > 500 HU, which was de ned as the threshold to detect calci ed plaques based on the results of previous studies with intravascular imaging [6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CCTA-measured CACS is widely used for the quantitative evaluation of calcium burden [9] and prediction of coronary events [10,11], and is calculated based on regions with CT values ≥ 130 HU [9]. On the other hand, CPV is calculated by the total volume of regions with CT values > 500 HU, which was de ned as the threshold to detect calci ed plaques based on the results of previous studies with intravascular imaging [6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective CCTA studies were performed for each vessel evaluated with OCT. Coronary plaques were de ned as structures with a minimum 1 mm² area within or adjacent to the arterial lumen, clearly distinguishable from the vessel lumen, and surrounded by pericardial tissue; tissue with signal intensity below − 30 Houns eld units (HU) was considered pericardial fat and excluded from the analysis. Based on the results of our previous study with OCT [7][8][9], each tissue was classi ed by its CT value (< -30, -30 to 50, 51 to 200, 201 to 500, and > 500 HU indicated pericardial fat, low-attenuation plaque, brous plaque, enhanced media, and calci ed plaque, respectively). Non-calci ed plaques were de ned as lowattenuation or brous plaques.…”
Section: Ccta Procedures and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we evaluated the lesion length (mm), minimal lumen diameter (mm), % diameter stenosis, minimal lumen area (mm 2 ), and % area stenosis. % diameter stenosis and % area stenosis are calculated as mean reference lumen diameter minus the minimal lumen diameter divided by the mean reference lumen diameter and mean reference lumen area minus the minimal lumen area divided by the mean reference lumen area in the cross-sectional images, respectively 9 . Mean reference diameter and mean reference area are defined as (proximal + distal reference diameters) divided by 2 and (proximal + distal reference areas) divided by 2, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive tool for evaluating the coronary plaque morphology; coronary plaques can be classified on the basis of computed tomography (CT) values as low-attenuation, fibrous, and calcified plaques, with quantitative assessment of plaque volumes 6 8 . CCTA-calculated coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is widely used to quantitatively evaluate the coronary artery calcium burden 9 , where a higher CACS is related to poorer clinical outcomes as compared with lower CACS 10 , 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%