Clinical correlation of MRI findings of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joints

Taşkaya-Yýlmaz, N; Öḡütcen-Toller, Melahat

doi:10.1016/s0266-4356(02)00140-7

Cited by 28 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The angle between the vertical line that was drawn through the midpoint and the line drawn through the posterior margin of the disk was measured on sagittal oblique MRI for each TMJ. 17 Position of the Anterior Band of the Disk A tangent (EX) is drawn from the lower edge of the articular eminence (E) to the upper edge of the external auditory meatus (X). Line is then drawn perpendicular to the anterior band of the disk (EZ).…”

Section: Position Of the Posterior Band Of The Diskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Temporomandibular Joint

Yang¹,

Song²,

Dong³

et al. 2015

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Position Of the Posterior Band Of The Diskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Temporomandibular Joint

Yang¹,

Song²,

Dong³

et al. 2015

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The other seven studies examined the sagittal and coronal views. 1,17,18,[20][21][22][23] Of the eight selected articles, 1,17-23 seven examined ID 1,17-22 (cluster n ¼ 3, single n ¼ 3, both n ¼ 1) and seven examined both IDR and IDnoR 1,17-21,23 (cluster n ¼ 4, single n ¼ 2, both n ¼ 1). All measures within these clusters must be scored positive for the diagnosis to be made, although reporting of the scoring method was not consistently detailed or transparent.…”

Section: Study Descriptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We identified four trials [17][18][19][20] that explored the presence or absence of a click through palpation for various types of ID. Although these trials appear to have had the same type of clinical setting, used the same reference tests and clinical tests, and had similar population characteristics, they were heterogeneous in terms of pre-test probability.…”

Section: Clicksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is very low to moderate-quality evidence that the presence of any click is of rare importance in identifying ID (4 trials, [17][18][19][20] …”

Section: Clicksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis of trials (2 trials, 19,20 113 participants) indicating crepitation as a test in identifying participants suffering from ID. One trial 19 with 40 participants yielded very low quality evidence suggesting that the sign of crepitation has a moderate and usually important probability that IDnoR is present (þLR: 5.88 [95% CI, 1.95-17.76]).…”

Section: Other Tests Vs Mrimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Diagnostic Validity of Clinical Tests in Temporomandibular Internal Derangement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Chaput

Gross

Stewart

et al. 2012

Physiotherapy Canada

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic validity of clinical tests for temporomandibular internal derangement relative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched from 1994 through 2009. Independent reviewers conducted study selection; risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included in Systematic reviews (QUADAS); b9/14) and data abstraction. Overall quality of evidence was profiled using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Agreement was measured using quadratic weighted kappa (kw). Positive (þ) or negative (À) likelihood ratios (LR) with 95% CIs were calculated and pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird method and a random-effects model when homogeneous (I 2 b 0.40, Q-test p a 0.10). Findings of this review will assist clinicians in deciding which diagnostic tests to use when internal derangement is suspected. The literature search revealed a lack of high-quality studies; further research with adequate description of patient populations, blinded assessments, and both sagittal and coronal MRI planes is therefore recommended.Key Words: diagnosis; magnetic resonance imaging; predictive value of tests; temporomandibular joint disorders. RÉ SUMÉObjectif : É valuer la validité du diagnostic ré sultant de tests cliniques en imagerie de ré sonance magné tique (IRM) pour le dé pistage du dé rangement interne de l'articulation temporo-mandibulaire (ATM). Mé thode : Une recherche a é té effectué e dans les bases de donné es MEDLINE et Embase pour les anné es 1994 à 2009. Des examinateurs indé pendants ont procé dé au choix des é tudes ré pertorié es ; les risques de biais ont é té é valué s à l'aide de l'é chelle QUADAS (Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included in Systematic reviews ), visant à é valuer la qualité des é tudes sur la fiabilité diagnostique incluses dans les revues systé matiques (le pointage obtenu a é té b9/14) et à l'aide d'abstraction des donné es. Le profil de la qualité globale des preuves a é té é tabli avec l'é chelle GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Le degré d'accord a é té mesuré à l'aide du coefficient quadratique kappa pondé ré (kw). Les rapports de vraisemblance (RV) positifs ( þ ) ou né gatifs ( À ) avec intervalles de confiance de 95 % ont é té calculé s et groupé s suivant la mé thode de DerSimonian-Laird et à l'aide d'un modè le à effets alé atoires lorsque les donné es é taient homogè nes (I 2 b 0,40, test-Q p a 0,10). Ré sultats : Nous avons retenu 8 des 36 é tudes identifié es. Les preuves voulant que les tests individuels de dé viation (RVþ : 6,37 [95 % IC : 2,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)03]) et de cré pitation ([RV : 5,) soient fiables é taient de trè s faible qualité , alors qu'un ensemble de tests regroupant cré pitation, dé viation, douleur et ouverture limité e de la bouche sont les plus valables au moment de dé terminer s'il y a effectivement dé rangement interne sans ré duction (RVþ : 6,37 [95 % IC :...

show abstract

Temporomandibular Disorders: Etiology and Classification

Okeson

2015

TMD and Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical correlation of MRI findings of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joints

Cited by 28 publications

References 22 publications

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Temporomandibular Joint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Temporomandibular Joint

The Diagnostic Validity of Clinical Tests in Temporomandibular Internal Derangement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Temporomandibular Disorders: Etiology and Classification

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About