2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical correlates of mind wandering in adults with ADHD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit disorder, mood disorders…etc.) and non‐clinical populations that may show special difficulties to notice and disengage from mind wandering episodes when necessary (Biederman et al., 2019; Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit disorder, mood disorders…etc.) and non‐clinical populations that may show special difficulties to notice and disengage from mind wandering episodes when necessary (Biederman et al., 2019; Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings from two separate ADHD cohorts highlight SITUT-CPM generalizability to a clinical context and offer novel neurophysiological evidence for previously identified, clinically relevant ADHD subgroups. 8 We hypothesize that ADHD patients with high, compared to low, in the domain of sustained attention. 80 A neurofeedback training paradigm was also shown to target and enhance DMN-FPCN anticorrelation, 78 and it remains uncertain whether there would be a clinical benefit of targeting these connections in tandem with the broader, distributed set of network interactions that characterized the SITUT-CPM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous findings indicate that ADHD individuals with high Mind Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) scores (> 23) exhibit increased severity of ADHD symptoms. 8 Thus, we classified 49 ADHD adults into high (n = 31) versus low (n = 18) SITUT subgroups, based on the MWQ, within a cohort of patients that underwent rs-fMRI (7 mins each) at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. These two groups did not show significant differences in head motion (P = 0.43, Wilcoxon rank sum test, M±SD of 0.092±0.027 mm for high SITUT participants, 0.088±0.027 mm for low SITUT participants), age (P = 0.097; M±SD of 32.0±7.5 for high SITUT participants, 28.2±7.0 for low SITUT participants) sex (high SITUT: 18 females, 13 males; low SITUT: 7 females, 11 males), or ADHD medication status (high SITUT: 27.6% using medication; low SITUT: 25% using medication).…”
Section: 3: External Validation #4: Mit Dataset (Adhd Adults)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations