2018
DOI: 10.1037/int0000097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical consensus strategies to repair ruptures in the therapeutic alliance.

Abstract: The findings are consistent with the growing literature on the value of using certain alliance-focused interventions during a rupture. The findings point to the importance of therapists' awareness of the state of the alliance so that they can identify when ruptures are occurring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding negative effects is essential because it allows clients to make informed decisions about the risks and benefits of ICBT, helps researchers continuously improve the design and delivery of ICBT, and ensures clients do not experience unnecessary harm or distress (Crawford et al, 2016; Rozental et al, 2018; Scott and Young, 2016). Moreover, from the clinician perspective, understanding negative effects puts therapists in a position to respond to and address negative effects in treatment, which could ultimately serve to bolster outcomes and the therapeutic alliance, similar to how past researchers have found that therapist response to an alliance rupture can be beneficial to outcomes in therapy (Eubanks et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Understanding negative effects is essential because it allows clients to make informed decisions about the risks and benefits of ICBT, helps researchers continuously improve the design and delivery of ICBT, and ensures clients do not experience unnecessary harm or distress (Crawford et al, 2016; Rozental et al, 2018; Scott and Young, 2016). Moreover, from the clinician perspective, understanding negative effects puts therapists in a position to respond to and address negative effects in treatment, which could ultimately serve to bolster outcomes and the therapeutic alliance, similar to how past researchers have found that therapist response to an alliance rupture can be beneficial to outcomes in therapy (Eubanks et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Precisely, ruptures manifest themselves through phases of lack of coordination characterized by non-cooperative behaviors between participants, while repairs through coordination phases identified by cooperative behaviors; both of them are expressed through verbal and non-verbal communication (Colli and Lingiardi, 2009;Morán et al, 2016;Colli et al, 2017). The therapist's capacity to acknowledge and manage these moments could lead the therapy to positive changes or negative results (Eubanks et al, 2018). Therefore, the intersubjective negotiation in the therapeutic relationship involves a reciprocal regulation process that can itself be a mechanism of therapeutic change Muran, 2003, 2006;Martinez Guzman et al, 2014): shifts in the collaboration and coordination levels can be considered fundamental keys of change (Colli and Lingiardi, 2009;Lingiardi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Hardy and Llewelyn (2015) point out, over the years, the study of the dynamics underlying the therapeutic relationship has involved the use of different methodologies (e.g., individual case studies, qualitative or quantitative analysis, naturalistic studies) and different analysis techniques (e.g., standardized methods, hermeneutics approaches, speech analysis) to provide empirical evidence aimed at explaining the role of factors that foster clinical change (e.g., Elliott et al, 2009;Eubanks et al, 2018;Smink et al, 2019). However, in recent decades, psychotherapy research has been moving toward an integrated approach of qualitative and quantitative methods, the mixed methods approach (Creswell and Plano Clark, 2017), to have a fuller picture of the ecological context of the therapeutic interaction supported by objective measures (Gelo et al, 2012;Bartholomew and Lockard, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, these results suggest certain clinical implications. Although it is true that each patient's internal representations are unique due to being subjective, identifying the predominant ones in each personality style can be a useful clinical strategy for therapists, but not only to characterize the personality styles of their patients in terms of their overriding RD: in addition, they can be used as verbal markers indicating change, stuck or rupture moments experienced during the session (Eubanks, Burckell, & Goldfried, 2018;Valdés et al, 2016). The greater proportion of RD associated with romantic partners as relational objects during stuck episodes may point to the presence of internal representations connected with this meaningful other, which are problematic, and which persistently recur throughout the therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%