Clinical consensus strategies for interpersonal problems between young adults and their parents.

Eubanks‐Carter, Catherine; Burckell, Lisa A.; Goldfried, Marvin R.

doi:10.1037/a0018557

Cited by 17 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 78 publications

(71 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the specific strategies are different, the finding regarding general consensus at the level of most and least effective strategies replicates previous research with therapists (Eubanks et al, 2010;Eubanks-Carter et al, 2018) and extends these results to a broader class of stressful situations. These results can also speak to bridging the gap between researchers and therapists.…”

Section: Therapist Ratings Of Emotion Regulation Strategy Effectivenesupporting

confidence: 84%

“…However, it is unclear if they do, in part because researchers rarely solicit input from therapists or other professionals providing direct patient care. By soliciting therapists’ expertise in rating the effectiveness of emotion regulation strategies, researchers can determine which strategies are most likely to translate between the laboratory and the clinic so the functioning of these strategies in clinical populations can be more comprehensively understood (Chambless, 2014; Eubanks et al ., 2018; Eubanks‐Carter et al ., 2010; Goldfried et al ., 2014; Tasca et al ., 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Researchers have used the Expert Consensus Guideline Series (Frances et al ., 1998) to iteratively (1) solicit examples of difficult therapeutic situations, (2) solicit potential responses to those situations, and (3) ask expert therapists, designated by others, to rate the effectiveness of those responses. In situations involving interpersonal problems between young adults and their parents, most expert therapists rated exploring patients’ emotional experiences and providing validation as highly effective strategies (Eubanks‐Carter et al ., 2010). In situations involving ruptures of the therapeutic alliance, most expert therapists rated exploring the rupture and validating the patient as highly effective strategies (Eubanks et al ., 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

On what do therapists agree? Assessing therapist evaluations of emotion regulation strategy effectiveness

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To develop more unified, process-based, and disseminable psychotherapy treatments, it is important to determine if there is consensus among therapists regarding intervention strategies. Design: Because emotion regulation is a cornerstone of modern treatments and a thriving area of clinical research, we assessed therapists' ratings of the effectiveness of commonly studied emotion regulation strategies. Methods: Therapists (n = 582) read eleven vignettes describing stressful scenarios and rated the effectiveness of ten emotion regulation strategies in each scenario. Results: Across therapists, we found general consensus regarding the most (i.e., problem-solving) and least (i.e., concealing emotions) effective strategies. Cognitive/behavioral/third-wave therapists rated acceptance and distraction as more effective, and emotional expression and gathering information as less effective, than other therapists, Fs > 4.20, ps < .05, whereas hours of clinical experience were generally unrelated to strategy effectiveness ratings. Conclusions: We discuss what these points of agreement and relative disagreement among therapists reveal about a more unified, process-based treatment approach and how these results can guide emotion regulation research.

show abstract

Section: Therapist Ratings Of Emotion Regulation Strategy Effectivenesupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

On what do therapists agree? Assessing therapist evaluations of emotion regulation strategy effectiveness

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Clinician-to-researcher feedback loops allow clinicians to help evidence-based researchers refine their thinking and procedures and to improve their evidence-based models accordingly (e.g., Goldfried, 2011). Such feedback mechanisms support better clinical practice (e.g., Eubanks-Carter, Burkell, & Goldfried, 2010). Researchers and clinicians would both benefit from involving each other more directly in their work.…”

Section: Suggestions For Researchers: Expanding Our View Of Evidence-mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Divide Between “Evidenced‐Based” Approaches and Practitioners of Traditional Theories of Family Therapy

Dattilio

Piercy

Davis³

2013

J Marital Family Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evidenced-based approaches continue to grow in the field of family therapy. However, practicing family therapists do not always embrace these approaches. In this article, we explore factors contributing to practitioners' concerns with evidence-based treatments and suggest a broader, more clinically palatable view of evidenced-based treatment. We also suggest how family therapy researchers, practitioners, and educators might begin to close the researcher-clinician divide in the best interest of all concerned.

show abstract

“…Jeffrey Magnavita's United Psychotherapy Project (Magnavita, 2008) also collects information from clinicians, cataloguing their psychotherapeutic techniques and methods in an effort to provide a comprehensive and organized database that cuts across theoretical orientations. Another innovative methodology includes collecting data from expert psychotherapists regarding their approaches to specific clinical problems (e.g., Eubanks-Carter, Burckell, & Goldfried, 2010). …”

Section: A Translational Model Of Rpimentioning

confidence: 99%

A translational model of research-practice integration.

Vivian

Hershenberg²,

Teachman³

et al. 2012

Psychotherapy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We propose a four-level, recursive Research-Practice Integration framework as a heuristic to (a) integrate and reflect on the articles in this Special Section as contributing to a bidirectional bridge between research and practice, and (b) consider additional opportunities to address the research–practice gap. Level 1 addresses Treatment Validation studies and includes an article by Lochman and colleagues concerning the programmatic adaptation, implementation, and dissemination of the empirically supported Coping Power treatment program for youth aggression. Level 2 translation, Training in Evidence-Based Practice, includes a paper by Hershenberg, Drabick, and Vivian, which focuses on the critical role that predoctoral training plays in bridging the research–practice gap. Level 3 addresses the Assessment of Clinical Utility and Feedback to Research aspects of translation. The articles by Lambert and Youn, Kraus, and Castonguay illustrate the use of commercial outcome packages that enable psychotherapists to integrate ongoing client assessment, thus enhancing the effectiveness of treatment implementation and providing data that can be fed back to researchers. Lastly, Level 4 translation, the Cross-Level Integrative Research and Communication, concerns research efforts that integrate data from clinical practice and all other levels of translation, as well as communication efforts among all stakeholders, such as researchers, psychotherapists, and clients. Using a two-chair technique as a framework for his discussion, Wolfe's article depicts the struggle inherent in research–practice integration efforts and proposes a rapprochement that highlights advancements in the field.

show abstract

Clinical consensus strategies for interpersonal problems between young adults and their parents.

Cited by 17 publications

References 78 publications

On what do therapists agree? Assessing therapist evaluations of emotion regulation strategy effectiveness

On what do therapists agree? Assessing therapist evaluations of emotion regulation strategy effectiveness

The Divide Between “Evidenced‐Based” Approaches and Practitioners of Traditional Theories of Family Therapy

A translational model of research-practice integration.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About