2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079001015.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical comparison of the measurement of the IOP with the ocular blood flow tonometer, the Tonopen XL and the Goldmann applanation tonometer

Abstract: ABSTRACT.Purpose: In addition to measuring ocular blood flow, the ocular blood flow tonometer (OBF) can also be set to solely record intraocular pressure (IOP). In this mode it provides a quick means of tonometry which may allow nursing staff to be more easily trained in its use than conventional Goldmann tonometry. With a view to its eventual use in nurse-led clinics we undertook a study to compare both the OBF tonometer and our currently favoured nurse practitioners tonometer the tonopen XL with Goldmann ton… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors also compared IOP values determined in an outpatient setting using Goldmann tonometry versus values measured during 24-hour phasing using Tono-pen, but argue that the use of Tono-pen in circadian measurements may in fact have underestimated IOP peaks and fluctuation, because data suggest that the Tono-pen may produce lower values than Goldmann at the higher part of the IOP spectrum. 4 In a similar study, Barkana et al 6 reviewed the records of 32 OAG patients who underwent Goldmann tonometry in the sitting position every two hours from 7 AM until midnight and Perkins tonometry in the supine position at 6 AM. They compared office-hours and outside office-hours values recorded on the same 24-hour IOP curve for each patient, as well as IOP values determined in up to five previous outpatient visits.…”
Section: Circadian Iop Variations In Treated Eyesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also compared IOP values determined in an outpatient setting using Goldmann tonometry versus values measured during 24-hour phasing using Tono-pen, but argue that the use of Tono-pen in circadian measurements may in fact have underestimated IOP peaks and fluctuation, because data suggest that the Tono-pen may produce lower values than Goldmann at the higher part of the IOP spectrum. 4 In a similar study, Barkana et al 6 reviewed the records of 32 OAG patients who underwent Goldmann tonometry in the sitting position every two hours from 7 AM until midnight and Perkins tonometry in the supine position at 6 AM. They compared office-hours and outside office-hours values recorded on the same 24-hour IOP curve for each patient, as well as IOP values determined in up to five previous outpatient visits.…”
Section: Circadian Iop Variations In Treated Eyesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In six studies 144,153,157,166,206,216 (40%), cases were selected consecutively. Nine studies 75,138,140,144,157,169,188,191,216 (60%) reported individual measures taken within 1 hour and 10 studies 75,138,140,144,166,169,188,206,207,216 (61%) that the same clinical data were available for interpretation as would be in clinical practice.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have demonstrated that tonopen tends to overestimate low IOPs and underestimate high IOPs [7,8,9,10]. Others have concluded that there is no such variation [11,12].…”
Section: Indirectmentioning
confidence: 99%