1987
DOI: 10.1088/0143-0815/8/3/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical comparison of one in vitro and three in-line blood gas P(O2) sensors during cardiopulmonary bypass

Abstract: During 17 cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) operations, arterial PO2 measurements were taken at 5 min intervals using four different types of PO2 sensor; three in-line (CardioMet-1000, Polytrode, and Gas-Stat) and one blood gas analyser (IL-1302). Comparisons between sensors were made relative to the CardioMet-1000. The three in-line sensors showed close agreement. The mean and standard deviation of the difference between the Gas-Stat and the CardioMet-1000 was 0.7 +/- 4.7 kPa, and between the Polytrode and the Car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major advantage of continuous in-line blood gas measurement is standardization of the blood gas control technique,17 but there is also evidence that in-line techniques are more accurate. [18][19][20] An ideal system will use in-line monitors with electrical outputs to allow automated data collection by computer.…”
Section: Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of continuous in-line blood gas measurement is standardization of the blood gas control technique,17 but there is also evidence that in-line techniques are more accurate. [18][19][20] An ideal system will use in-line monitors with electrical outputs to allow automated data collection by computer.…”
Section: Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%