2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-005-6898-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Comparison of Ibutilide and Propafenone for Converting Atrial Flutter

Abstract: Ibutilide is highly effective for rapidly terminating atrial flutter. This new class III drug, under monitored conditions, is a potential alternative to currently available cardioversion options.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean time to arrhythmia termination was 10-23 min. In other studies, ibutilide was superior to propafenone for treating Af (90% vs. 30%, p b 0.01) [16] and AF (70.73% vs. 48.78%) [17]. In a comparison study, ibutilide was found superior than Sotalol in terminating Af (70% vs. 56%) and AF (44% vs. 11%) [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The mean time to arrhythmia termination was 10-23 min. In other studies, ibutilide was superior to propafenone for treating Af (90% vs. 30%, p b 0.01) [16] and AF (70.73% vs. 48.78%) [17]. In a comparison study, ibutilide was found superior than Sotalol in terminating Af (70% vs. 56%) and AF (44% vs. 11%) [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The main reason might be as follows: (1) Class Ic drugs can decrease TCL without converting flutter. A previous study showed that there was a significant lengthening of the AFL cycle (194 ± 32 ms vs. 268 ± 42 ms) 11 from before to after drug usage; (2) class Ic drugs might lengthen the effective refractory period of the AP; (3) the depression of the AVN could decrease the anterograde conduction over the AVN, which might increase the anterograde conduction over the AP; (4) the match between AP effective refractory period and TCL might lead to 1:1 conduction. Hence, we recommend avoiding the use of propafenone injection in patients with ATA concomitant with anterograde conduction of a bystander AP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%