2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12154-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characteristics of primary pars plana vitrectomy combined with air filling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Abstract: To detect the prognostic factors associated with initial reattachment after primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with air tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). We retrospectively reviewed 92 eyes of 92 patients with RRD. All eyes underwent PPV with air tamponade and a follow-up of at least 6 months. Initial anatomical success was defined as reattachment of the retina by a single operation. We performed univariate analysis to detect the presence of any difference between eyes with a successful i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We explored the efficacy, safety, and operative parameters of two C3F8 tamponade methods combined with PPV for RD in this study. In previous studies, the rate of retinal reattachment after Vitrectomy combined with C3F8 tamponade was 91.2%∼96.2% [6, 12‒14]. In our study, the single-surgery retinal reattachment rates of pure group and mixed group were 97.4% and 96.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We explored the efficacy, safety, and operative parameters of two C3F8 tamponade methods combined with PPV for RD in this study. In previous studies, the rate of retinal reattachment after Vitrectomy combined with C3F8 tamponade was 91.2%∼96.2% [6, 12‒14]. In our study, the single-surgery retinal reattachment rates of pure group and mixed group were 97.4% and 96.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Compared with the logMAR BCVA at baseline, both the two groups did not show significant change (respectively, 0.03 ± 0.98 vs. 0.14 ± 1.01, p = 0.837 vs. p = 0.183). For the slow absorption of long-acting gas like C3F8, it is hard to restore the patients’ vision in a short time [ 13 ]. Therefore, we studied patients with follow-up data more than 1 month after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%