1987
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90048-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characteristics of patients with idiopathic pain syndromes. Depressive symptomatology and patient pain drawings

Abstract: The frequency of depressive symptomatology as estimated by means of self-rating on a visual analogue scale and the pain drawings by patients were compared between healthy volunteers, patients with neurogenic pain syndromes and patients with idiopathic pain syndromes. All patients with chronic pain syndromes had significantly more depressive symptomatology than the healthy volunteers. Patients with idiopathic pain syndromes had significantly more inhibition symptoms--memory disturbances and concentration diffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood (Hb, ESR and CRP) and stimulated saliva samples were collected at baseline, at 6 weeks and at 12 weeks. In addition, the following assessments were made: a four-stage functional classification [29]; joint score index (measuring tenderness in proximal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, wrist, elbow, shoulder, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, jaw, cervical, hip, knee, talocrural, talocalcanear, metatarsophalangeal and toe joints on each side; scores 0-3) [30] performed by the principal investigator; the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) [31]; Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS) [32]; Pain disability index (PDI, 7 VAS variables) [33]; and Comprehensible Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS, 5 VAS variables) [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood (Hb, ESR and CRP) and stimulated saliva samples were collected at baseline, at 6 weeks and at 12 weeks. In addition, the following assessments were made: a four-stage functional classification [29]; joint score index (measuring tenderness in proximal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, wrist, elbow, shoulder, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, jaw, cervical, hip, knee, talocrural, talocalcanear, metatarsophalangeal and toe joints on each side; scores 0-3) [30] performed by the principal investigator; the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) [31]; Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS) [32]; Pain disability index (PDI, 7 VAS variables) [33]; and Comprehensible Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS, 5 VAS variables) [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When completing these questionnaires, patients are provided with an outline of a human figure and instructed to shade and/or mark the painful area. Perhaps the biggest advantage of pain drawings are their ability to highlight differences in pain location across different pain conditions for comparison (Almay, 1987;Mannion et al, 2007), as well as exploring the lateralising effects of chronic pain (Margolis et al, 1985;Löfvander et al, 2007). Whilst the technique has demonstrated high test-retest reliability (Margolis et al, 1988, r = 0.85;Ohnmeiss, 2000), the qualitative nature of such tasks ultimately leads to the question of what is actually being measured (Margolis et al, 1986;Parker et al, 1995).…”
Section: Pain and Body Drawingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimuli whose site and intensity are well defined are less likely to arouse the patient's specific vigilance than the vague ones (e.g. Almay, 1987;Kostarczyk, 2003). The patient's attitude is of prime importance.…”
Section: Hypervigilance and Painmentioning
confidence: 99%