Objective. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-25% of breast cancers. It is increasingly recognized that TNBC is a motley disease. TNBC and basal-like (BL) subtype are different molecular classes of breast cancer with a high degree of overlap. However, a smaller fraction lacks the expression of basal markers in spite of being TNBC and is called non-basal-like (NBL). e aim of this study is to assess the clinicopathological features in TNBC and compare its BL and NBL subtypes. Material and Methods. A total of 200 subjects fulfilling the inclusion criteria of study were identified from the electronic medical records of institution. e tumor sections of subjects were immunohistochemically stained for basal markers, namely, 34βE12, c-Kit, and EGFR, in order to differentiate between BL and NBL subtypes. Comprehensive data were assembled from subjects' clinical records. e features of TNBC and their associations with the two subtypes were assessed using statistical analyses. Results. TNBC constituted 22% of all breast cancers. e family history of cancer was observed to be significantly associated with stage (p � 0.013). e proportions of BL and NBL subtypes were equal. Of all parameters compared between two subtypes, only lymphovascular invasion was found to have statistically significant difference (p � 0.019).ough no statistical significant difference between overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of two subgroups was found, BL subtype has slightly shorter DFS and OS compared to NBL. Conclusion. Both BL and NBL subtypes occur in equal proportions; hence, basalness and triple negativity are not synonyms. ough BL and NBL are prognostically similar, BL subtype shows a trend towards slightly shorter DFS and OS compared to NBL.