2009
DOI: 10.1086/595689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Isoniazid‐Monoresistant Tuberculosis

Abstract: Background Risk factors and treatment outcomes under program conditions for isoniazid (INH) mono-resistant tuberculosis have not been well described. Methods Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for all culture-confirmed, INH mono-resistant tuberculosis cases (N=137) reported to the San Francisco Tuberculosis Control Section between 1993 and 2005 and compared to a time-matched sample of drug susceptible cases (N=274). Results In multivariate analysis, only history of treatment for latent (OR 3.1, 9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
101
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(9 reference statements)
7
101
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of isoniazidresistant TB among newly diagnosed cases ranges geographically from 5 to 25% (16). Although the treatment outcomes for such cases remain unclear, several retrospective studies suggest that further drug resistance is promoted in the community when isoniazid resistance is not recognized and standard treatment is provided (17)(18)(19)(20). Interestingly, the CϪ15T mutation, which is significantly less common than the katG S315T mutation in isoniazid-resistant isolates worldwide (21) and in Panama, was present in all 3 cases in our study, suggesting the possibility of recent transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The prevalence of isoniazidresistant TB among newly diagnosed cases ranges geographically from 5 to 25% (16). Although the treatment outcomes for such cases remain unclear, several retrospective studies suggest that further drug resistance is promoted in the community when isoniazid resistance is not recognized and standard treatment is provided (17)(18)(19)(20). Interestingly, the CϪ15T mutation, which is significantly less common than the katG S315T mutation in isoniazid-resistant isolates worldwide (21) and in Panama, was present in all 3 cases in our study, suggesting the possibility of recent transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…probes can facilitate trial conduction and help ensure inclusion of appropriate participants. In clinical care, there has been debate about the significance of INH monoresistance and effects on TB treatment outcomes (24)(25)(26)(27). However, a South African study (27) and a meta-analysis (26) have both demonstrated poor TB outcomes with INH monoresistance, and two studies suggest that early detection of INH resistance with modification of treatment led to better outcomes (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical care, there has been debate about the significance of INH monoresistance and effects on TB treatment outcomes (24)(25)(26)(27). However, a South African study (27) and a meta-analysis (26) have both demonstrated poor TB outcomes with INH monoresistance, and two studies suggest that early detection of INH resistance with modification of treatment led to better outcomes (24,25). Further, the presence of rifampin resistance alone cannot be relied upon to predict INH resistance; INH susceptibility ranges from Յ11% to Ͼ40% of RIF-resistant isolates, depending on the setting (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, treatment failures are frequently reported, suggesting inadequate eradication of chlamydiae from the sites of infection (21). C. trachomatis treatment failure has been observed in up to 14% of patients, whereas only 2% of patients seem to fail initial treatment in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections (1,4). In addition, the propensity of C. trachomatis to induce persistent infections when subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations are applied is of major concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%