2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-010-1746-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characteristics and electrodiagnostic features in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, double crush syndrome, and cervical radiculopathy

Abstract: Similar unilateral neck and upper limb symptoms are often due to various entrapment neuropathies; carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radiculopathy (CR) are common causes among them. Therefore, we investigated the clinical characteristics and electrodiagnostic features of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, cervical radiculopathy, and both conditions, called double crush syndrome (DCS). The medical records and electrodiagnostic reports of 866 patients with suspected CTS and CR visited a tertiary-care h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The double crush hypothesis also suggests that serial constraints to axoplasmic flow, while individually are insufficient to result in clinically appreciable nerve dysfunction, can be an additive in causing ultimate nerve dysfunction. There exists both clinical and experimental evidence to support multiple compression sites in peripheral nerves [1,6,7,14,17,21,23,27,32]. Other potential etiologies include medical conditions which increase the susceptibility of compression (e.g., diabetic neuropathy), neurologic conditions (e.g., syringomyelia), and genetic Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double crush hypothesis also suggests that serial constraints to axoplasmic flow, while individually are insufficient to result in clinically appreciable nerve dysfunction, can be an additive in causing ultimate nerve dysfunction. There exists both clinical and experimental evidence to support multiple compression sites in peripheral nerves [1,6,7,14,17,21,23,27,32]. Other potential etiologies include medical conditions which increase the susceptibility of compression (e.g., diabetic neuropathy), neurologic conditions (e.g., syringomyelia), and genetic Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Имеет значение изначальное состояние периферического нерва, подвергаю-щегося компрессии: тоннельные невропатии развиваются быстрее, если уже имеется поражение аксональных транс-портных систем в проксимальном отделе (МАС-синдром -синдром множественного аксоплазматического сдавления при плексопатии или радикулопатии) или дистально (поли-невропатии или множественные мононевропатии) на фоне дефицита аксоплазматического тока и нейротрофических факторов, требующихся для регенерации аксона [9,11,13]. Поэтому у каждого больного для уточнения патогенеза тон-нельного синдрома и подбора оптимальной терапии необ-ходимо учитывать наличие острых, подострых и хрониче-ских повреждений на всех уровнях периферической нерв-ной системы, указывающих на наследственную или приоб-ретенную узость фиброзно-костного канала.…”
Section: юв мозолевский ан баринов кафедра нервных болезней лечеunclassified
“…Важным диагностическим нейрофизиоло- М е т о д ы д и а г н о с т и к и Для оценки тяжести поражения и процессов восстано-вления функций нерва проводят нейрофизиологические исследования: электронейромиографию (ЭНМГ), количе-ственное сенсорное тестирование. При ЭНМГ определяют-ся снижение амплитуды и скорости проведения импульса по двигательным и чувствительным волокнам и увеличение резидуальной латенции в месте компрессии нерва и дис-тальнее [2,3,13,20].…”
Section: метатарзалгияunclassified
“…1,2 Frequently, patients with symptoms suggestive of compressive neuropathy will also have coexisting pain in the cervical spine region and a diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy (CR) by electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) or clinical examination. 3,4 Such patients may have double crush syndrome (DCS) with compression of nerve fibers at 2 distinct sites: 1 proximal in the C-spine, and 1 distal in the cubital tunnel, carpal tunnel, or elsewhere. Discerning which area of nerve compression or irritation, proximal or distal, is most responsible for a patient’s symptoms is often challenging for the clinician.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Multiple studies have failed to recognize an electrodiagnostic correlation between patients with isolated CTS and those diagnosed with DCS. 3 Furthermore, physical examination findings, such as the Tinel and Phalen signs, have also been shown to be unreliable as the sole method of evaluation in cases of suspected DCS, although they do correlate well with symptoms in patients with isolated CTS diagnosed by EDS. 3 In addition, Kwon et al, in 2006, evaluated the severity of CTS based on the level of confirmed CR (C6, C7, C8) with electrophysiologic parameters of median motor and sensory nerves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%