Clinical Characteristics and Contemporary Prognosis of Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundVentricular septal rupture (VSR) is a serious complication occurring after myocardial infarction (MI). Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a common complication of VSR and an important factor affecting its prognosis. CS can occur in either an immediate or delayed manner after VSR; however, studies on the risk factors associated with immediate or delayed CS are scarce.MethodsWe retrospectively studied patients diagnosed with VSR after MI and admitted to the West China Hospital between September 2009 and August 2023. Demographic data, medical history, physical examination results, electrocardiograms, and echocardiographic and hematological data were extracted from electronic medical records or archived records. CS was defined as hypotension (<90 mmHg) and/or the requirement for catecholamines, pulmonary congestion, and signs of end-organ failure. The CS onset time was defined as the time at which catecholamines were initiated.ResultsA total of 88 patients with VSR after MI, including 49 males (55.7%), were enrolled. The average age was 70.2 years. Of these patients, 32 (36.4%) who already had CS at the time of VSR discovery were defined as immediate CS, and 28 (31.8%) who developed CS within 2 weeks after VSR discovery were defined as delayed CS. A smaller left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and VSR discovered after admission were independent risk factors for immediate CS. Elevated heart rate and higher levels of creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme on admission were independent risk factors for delayed CS in patients without immediate CS after VSR.ConclusionsThe occurrence of CS in patients with VSR after MI has an evident time course. Thus, an early identification of patients at risk of immediate or delayed CS and optimization of treatment procedures may help improve the prognosis.

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Risk factors for immediate and delayed cardiogenic shock in patients with ventricular septal rupture after myocardial infarction

Wang,

Zhang,

Xiao

et al. 2023

“…A retrospective cohort study of 127 patients with PIVSR in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University in China found that the mortality of conservatively treated patients was extremely high. The 30-day mortality rate was 93.6% (73/78), and the long-term mortality rate was 96.2% (75/78); meanwhile, patients who survived early and underwent VSR repair surgery had a good long-term prognosis, which was similar for both percutaneous TCC surgery (25.8%, 8/31) and surgical repair (22.2%, 4/18) ( 14 ). Many studies have confirmed that untreated PIVSR has a high mortality rate, so timely surgical treatment is necessary.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Treatment Strategies for Ventricular Septal Rupture After Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Experience

Zhang

et al. 2022

ObjectiveTo analyze treatment strategies, prognosis, and related risk factors of patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture, as well as the impact of timing of surgical intervention.MethodsA total of 23 patients diagnosed with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture who were non-selectively admitted to Shanxi Provincial Cardiovascular Hospital between October 2017 and August 2021 were included in this study. The relevant clinical data, operation-related conditions, and follow-up data were summarized for all patients. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for the cumulative incidence of unadjusted mortality in patients with different treatment methods. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for in-hospital patient mortality.ResultsThe mean age of the study patients was 64.43 ± 7.54 years, 12(52.2%) were females. There was a significant difference in terms of postoperative residual shunt between the surgical and interventional closure groups (5.9 vs. 100%, respectively; P < 0.001). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 21.7%; however, even though the surgical group had a lower mortality rate than the interventional closure group (17.6 vs. 33%, respectively), this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.576). Univariate analysis showed that in-hospital survival group patients were significantly younger than in-hospital death group patients (62.50 ± 6.53 vs. 71.40 ± 7.37 years, respectively; P = 0.016), and that women had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate than men (P = 0.037). The average postoperative follow-up time was 18.11 ± 13.92 months; as of the end of the study all 14 patients in the surgical group were alive, Two out of four patients survived and two patients died after interventional closure. Univariate analysis showed that interventional closure was a risk factor for long-term death (P < 0.05).ConclusionSurgical operation is the most effective treatment for patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture; however, the best timing of the operation should be based on the patient's condition and comprehensively determined through real-time evaluation and monitoring. We believe that delaying the operation time as much as possible when the patient's condition permits can reduce postoperative mortality. Interventional closure can be used as a supplementary or bridge treatment for surgical procedures.

“…For VSR, conservative medical treatment, percutaneous transcatheter closure (TCC) or surgical repair are usually adopted clinically. The mortality rates of patients with medical treatment alone were extremely high ( 10 ). Hence, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association (ACCF/AHA) guidelines for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) propose surgical closure as the standard of care ( 11 , 12 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of influencing factors for prognosis of patients with ventricular septal perforation: A single-center retrospective study

Duan

Zhao

et al. 2022

Self Cite

BackgroundVentricular septal rupture (VSR) is a type of cardiac rupture, usually complicated by acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with a high mortality rate and often poor prognosis. The aim of our study was to investigate the factors influencing the long-term prognosis of patients with VSR from different aspects, comparing the evaluation performance of the Gensini score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and European Heart Surgery Risk Assessment System II (EuroSCORE II) score systems.MethodsThis study retrospectively enrolled 188 patients with VSR between Dec 9, 2011 and Nov 21, 2021at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. All patients were followed up until Jan 27, 2022 for clinical data, angiographic characteristics, echocardiogram outcomes, intraoperative, postoperative characteristics and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (30-day mortality, cardiac readmission). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to explore the predictors of long-term mortality.ResultsThe median age of 188 VSR patients was 66.2 ± 9.1 years and 97 (51.6%) were males, and there were 103 (54.8%) patients in the medication group, 34 (18.1%) patients in the percutaneous transcatheter closure (TCC) group, and 51 (27.1%) patients in the surgical repair group. The average follow-up time was 857.4 days. The long-term mortality of the medically managed group, the percutaneous TCC group, and the surgical repair group was 94.2, 32.4, and 35.3%, respectively. Whether combined with cardiogenic shock (OR 0.023, 95% CI 0.001–0.054, P = 0.019), NT-pro BNP level (OR 0.027, 95% CI 0.002–0.34, P = 0.005), EuroSCORE II (OR 0.530, 95% CI 0.305–0.918, P = 0.024) and therapy group (OR 3.518, 95% CI 1.079–11.463, P = 0.037) were independently associated with long-term mortality in patients with VSR, and this seems to be independent of the therapy group. The mortality rate of surgical repair after 2 weeks of VSR was much lower than within 2 weeks (P = 0.025). The cut-off point of EuroSCORE II was determined to be 14, and there were statistically significant differences between the EuroSCORE II < 14 group and EuroSCORE II≥14 group (HR = 0.2596, 95%CI: 0.1800–0.3744, Logrank P < 0.001).ConclusionPatients with AMI combined with VSR have a poor prognosis if not treated surgically, surgical repair after 2 weeks of VSR is a better time. In addition, EuroSCORE II can be used as a scoring system to assess the prognosis of patients with VSR.