2010
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2009.075937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characterisation of 29 neurofibromatosis type-1 patients with molecularly ascertained 1.4 Mb type-1 NF1 deletions

Abstract: These findings emphasise the importance of deletion analysis in NF1 since frequent monitoring of tumour presence and growth could potentiate early surgical intervention thereby improving patient survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
171
4
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
9
171
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, 5-10% are large 17q11.2 deletions encompassing the entire NF1 locus and neighbouring genes. 12 These large NF1 locus deletions have been associated with a more severe phenotype including an elevated risk for MPNSTs. [13][14] For patients with intragenic NF1 mutations (more than 90% of all NF1 cases), no clear-cut allele-phenotype correlations have been established so far [15][16][17][18] with the exception of a 3-bp inframe deletion (c.2970_2972delAAT) in exon 22 of the NF1 gene that has been associated with the absence of cutaneous neurofibromas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, 5-10% are large 17q11.2 deletions encompassing the entire NF1 locus and neighbouring genes. 12 These large NF1 locus deletions have been associated with a more severe phenotype including an elevated risk for MPNSTs. [13][14] For patients with intragenic NF1 mutations (more than 90% of all NF1 cases), no clear-cut allele-phenotype correlations have been established so far [15][16][17][18] with the exception of a 3-bp inframe deletion (c.2970_2972delAAT) in exon 22 of the NF1 gene that has been associated with the absence of cutaneous neurofibromas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, MLPA could not differentiate between a 1.4-Mb deletion and a larger, atypical deletion. Likewise, the currently available MLPA-kit (P122, version C1) cannot provide the degree of resolution required to distinguish between type-1 NF1 deletions (with breakpoints in the NF1-REPs) and atypical deletions with breakpoints located close to, but Deleted: whose Deleted: -F o r P e e r R e v i e w 5 outside of, the NF1-REPs A and C as outlined previously [Mautner et al, 2010]. Such atypical deletions could also encompass the GOSR1, TBC1D29, RHOT1, RHBDL3 and C17orf75 genes in addition to the 14 genes present within the type-1 deletion interval ( Figure 1A).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NF1 microdeletions are often associated with severe disease manifestations including a high tumour load, facial dysmorphism and mental retardation [Mensink et al, 2006;Venturin et al, 2006;Mautner et al, 2010;Pasmant et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deletions are usually associated with a more consistently severe phenotype, including facial dysmorphism, marked learning problems and increased neurofibroma burden. 8 More recently, a specific mutation has been found to be associated with a much milder NF1 phenotype with a lack of dermal neurofibromas, and increased rate of pulmonary stenosis (PS)-the NF1 exon 17 3-bp in-frame deletion (c.2970_2972delAAT). 9 In addition, heterozygous loss-offunction mutations in another gene, SPRED1, have been described to cause NF1-like disease associated with CALS and inguinal/axillary freckles but no neurofibromas or Lisch nodules (Legius syndrome (MIM# #611431)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group of patients with a specific genotype-phenotype correlation identified were those with large deletions involving the NF1 gene. 8 These patients have deletions of both the NF1 and a variable number of flanking genes. The deletions are usually associated with a more consistently severe phenotype, including facial dysmorphism, marked learning problems and increased neurofibroma burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%