2013
DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical benefits and economic impact of post-surgical care provided by pharmacists in a Canadian hospital

Abstract: The pharmacist's role in the management of the drug therapy needs of the post-surgical patient has the potential to improve clinical and patient outcomes and avoid healthcare costs. The inclusion of clinical pharmacists in surgical wards may result in $7 in savings for every $1 invested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(89 reference statements)
2
49
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting that for these two statements the mean scores of agreement were among the lowest for all three professional groups. Despite many reports about a positive economic impact of clinical pharmacists' activities in the literature (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), physicians and nurses found those clinical pharmacists' activities less important. Budgeting and cost containment in the hospital is the responsibility of managers rather than pharmacists.…”
Section: The Role Of a Clinical Pharmacist In The Hospital Systemmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is interesting that for these two statements the mean scores of agreement were among the lowest for all three professional groups. Despite many reports about a positive economic impact of clinical pharmacists' activities in the literature (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), physicians and nurses found those clinical pharmacists' activities less important. Budgeting and cost containment in the hospital is the responsibility of managers rather than pharmacists.…”
Section: The Role Of a Clinical Pharmacist In The Hospital Systemmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…lack of independent review) and lack of definitions for type of interventions (i.e. miscategorized interventions may result in fluctuations of cost estimates) . Our study addressed these limitations by examining both cost and clinical implications, using an independent review panel (including arbitration) for recommendation assessment, not excluding any recommendations from panel review, and the use of a priori defined categories for intervention classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[81213] These probabilities of VTE and bleeding were corresponded to the basic probability setting of ADEs (0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.4, and 0.6) which were extrapolated from the previous studies. [111415] To determine the probability of VTE (0.1 for the medical patients, 0.4 for the surgical patients) and bleeding (0.01) as ADEs caused by inappropriate VTEP was also based on previous studies and published reports. [139161718]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%