2008
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31812f7244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Assessment of Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Listeners

Abstract: Clinical Assessment of Music Perception is an efficient computerized test that may be used to measure 3 different aspects of music perception in CI users in a standardized and clinically practical manner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
112
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
13
112
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure for administering the CAMP test was the same as that previously described by Nimmons et al [2008] and Kang et al [2009]. Three components of music perception (pitch, melody, and timbre recognition) were assembled into a computer-driven exercise.…”
Section: Speech Reception Threshold In Steady Noise Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure for administering the CAMP test was the same as that previously described by Nimmons et al [2008] and Kang et al [2009]. Three components of music perception (pitch, melody, and timbre recognition) were assembled into a computer-driven exercise.…”
Section: Speech Reception Threshold In Steady Noise Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, different measurements should be used to gain insight in accuracy of music perception and the degree of music appreciation. The majority of previous researchers has tended to focus on music perception, rather than on music appreciation in adult CI users [5,9,10,15,16,[20][21][22][23][24]. A smaller number of studies focused on music appraisal or enjoyment by means of self-reported questionnaires or testing appraisal of musical excerpts [7,19,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal pitch cues may be derived from temporal envelopes used to modulate pulse trains delivered to each electrode, but these pitch cues are limited to approximately 300 Hz (see, e.g., Fraser & McKay, 2012). Previous studies with English-speaking adult CI users have shown that their melodic pitch perception is generally poor (Galvin, Fu, & Nogaki, 2007;Gfeller et al, 2007;Kang et al, 2008;Kong, Cruz, Jones, & Zeng, 2004;Nimmons et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have used melodic pitch discrimination or recognition of familiar melodies without rhythm cues to characterize English-speaking CI users' melodic pitch perception (see, e.g., Gfeller et al, 2007;Kang et al, 2008;Nimmons et al, 2008). Melodic contour identification (MCI) has been used to characterize CI users' functional pitch perception (Galvin, Eskridge, Oba, & Fu, 2012;Galvin et al, 2007;Galvin, Fu, & Oba, 2008;Galvin, Fu, & Shannon, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%