2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0643.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Assessment of Blood Glucose Homeostasis in Horses: Comparison of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with a Combined Intravenous Glucose and Insulin Test Protocol

Abstract: Background: The combined glucose-insulin test (CGIT) is helpful for evaluating insulin sensitivity. A continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) reports changes in interstitial glucose concentrations as they occur in the blood. Use of the CGMS minimizes animal contact and may be useful when performing a CGIT.Hypothesis: Results obtained using a CGMS are useful for the evaluation of glucose responses during the evaluation of insulin sensitivity in equids.Animals: Seven mature, obese ponies. Methods: Ponies wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(18 reference statements)
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CGM sensor and transmitter are normally implanted into the abdominal region of humans, and human skin is thinner and relatively fixed as compared to alpacas. Studies of other CGM systems in small animals, swine, and equine species placed the sensor in the subcutaneous space in the lateral cervical region caudal to the ear, along the dorsum, or lateral thoracic wall caudal to the scapula . The neck and thoracic areas would have been an ideal implant location except that alpacas can easily scratch these areas with their hind feet, and the ventral skin on the neck is very thick (over 0.5 cm in males).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CGM sensor and transmitter are normally implanted into the abdominal region of humans, and human skin is thinner and relatively fixed as compared to alpacas. Studies of other CGM systems in small animals, swine, and equine species placed the sensor in the subcutaneous space in the lateral cervical region caudal to the ear, along the dorsum, or lateral thoracic wall caudal to the scapula . The neck and thoracic areas would have been an ideal implant location except that alpacas can easily scratch these areas with their hind feet, and the ventral skin on the neck is very thick (over 0.5 cm in males).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, veterinary hospitals that treat alpacas with these glycemic disorders use a variety of laboratory‐based and point of care (POC) glucometers. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems have been used for many years in human medicine and have more recently been evaluated in several animal species . The CGM systems utilize a sensor implanted into the subcutaneous which transmits glucose concentrations to a receiver for evaluation by the patient or health care provider.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These CIG systems have been reported to rapidly detect the trends towards hypoglycaemic or hyperglycaemic events, eliminating the need of frequent blood collections and allowing tight glucose surveillance 9. Interstitial glucose concentrations measured by CIG have been reported to be closely correlated with conventional blood glucose assay methods in people 15–19. Various studies have described the use of early CIG systems in healthy adult horses, critically ill neonatal foals and adult horses with chronic endocrinopathies with variable results 12 15 16.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach might be useful for the purpose of monitoring glucose status in horses at risk of hypoglycaemia (Johnson et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Significant benefits regarding the use of continuous glucose monitoring technology in human diabetic patients at risk for hypoglycaemic episodes have recently been presented (Harris et al 2010;Saw et al 2017). A similar approach might be useful for the purpose of monitoring glucose status in horses at risk of hypoglycaemia (Johnson et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%