2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(02)00082-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical assessment of a generic DNA amplification assay for the identification of respiratory adenovirus infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, an assay that is able to detect as well as differentiate between AdV species groups such as the Adenoplex can have important clinical relevance in diagnosis and for epidemiological purposes. PCR methods of AdV detection offer a more sensitive and rapid alternative for diagnosis than traditional culture or immunofluorescence (1,18,20). Our data demonstrated that the Adenoplex assay was more sensitive (100%) and had equivalent specificity (100%) compared to viral culture.…”
Section: 69mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, an assay that is able to detect as well as differentiate between AdV species groups such as the Adenoplex can have important clinical relevance in diagnosis and for epidemiological purposes. PCR methods of AdV detection offer a more sensitive and rapid alternative for diagnosis than traditional culture or immunofluorescence (1,18,20). Our data demonstrated that the Adenoplex assay was more sensitive (100%) and had equivalent specificity (100%) compared to viral culture.…”
Section: 69mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Nested PCR assays have been shown to detect AdV with good sensitivity (1, 18) but involve a two-step PCR procedure increasing the time to complete the assay and chance of carryover contamination. The Adenoplex's sensitivity (at 100 and Ͻ1,000 copies of DNA/ml) is comparable to or better than that of the nested PCR assays, which detected between 400 and 2,500 copies/ml (1) and 640 copies/ml (18), respectively. In addition, the Adenoplex is a single-step PCR and can be completed in less time than a two-step nested PCR assay.…”
Section: 69mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PCR assays facilitating amplification across variable regions of the hexon gene therefore provide a possible approach to molecular typing. Some of the existing type-specific PCR assays, however, only permit the detection of selected serotypes (11,14,20,27,29,31); others are based on relatively complicated algorithms, including PCR amplification and subsequent digestion with different restriction enzymes (1). The lack of sequence information on all AdV serotypes and the existence of substrains within individual serotypes (6) have prevented the establishment of reliable and economic serotype-specific molecular assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). For the timely molecular analysis-based detection of adenoviruses from clinical samples, this methodology compares favorably to generic real-time TaqMan PCR assays (ϳ60 min, excluding DNA extraction) (14), generic direct PCR assays (6 h) (7), and nested PCR assays (6 to 24 h) (25), which have recently been described in published reports. Although each documented method could effectively detect adenoviruses in clinical samples, none presented the ability to determine the adenovirus serotype without further experimentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%