2021
DOI: 10.17219/acem/132036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical assessment and comparison of ACL reconstruction using synthetic graft (Neoligaments versus FiberTape)

Abstract: Background. Due to the low potential for primary biological healing of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the most popular approach is currently reconstruction using a graft. Recent research indicates that the technique of strengthening a damaged ligament with synthetic tapes (internal bracing) may be an alternative to reconstructive treatment, especially in cases of partial ACL damage.Objectives. To compare and evaluate the possibility of using a synthetic graft (Neoligaments or FiberTape) to treat partial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bodendorfer et al [14] presented a retrospective comparison of outcomes in patients undergoing ACLR with and without FiberTape® suture augmentation, with augmentation demonstrating less pain, improved PROMs and improved early return to activity, without evidence of over-constraint. A retrospective cohort study published by Barnas et al [51] reported comparable functional outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for partial ACL tears with synthetic augmentation using either a polyethylene terephthalate tape (Neoligaments) or Fiber-Tape® suture augmentation. A recent retrospective comparison published by Hopper et al [52] reported comparable re-injury and secondary surgery rates in patients undergoing ACLR versus those undergoing ACL repair with suture tape augmentation, in the context of acute proximal ACL ruptures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bodendorfer et al [14] presented a retrospective comparison of outcomes in patients undergoing ACLR with and without FiberTape® suture augmentation, with augmentation demonstrating less pain, improved PROMs and improved early return to activity, without evidence of over-constraint. A retrospective cohort study published by Barnas et al [51] reported comparable functional outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for partial ACL tears with synthetic augmentation using either a polyethylene terephthalate tape (Neoligaments) or Fiber-Tape® suture augmentation. A recent retrospective comparison published by Hopper et al [52] reported comparable re-injury and secondary surgery rates in patients undergoing ACLR versus those undergoing ACL repair with suture tape augmentation, in the context of acute proximal ACL ruptures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 In humans, suture tape applications include rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, ulnar collateral ligament repair, olecranon fracture repair, and patellar fracture repair, among others. [25][26][27][28][29] Suture tape is most commonly used in veterinary medicine as a lateral suture at the stifle and in toggle rod procedures for repair of coxofemoral luxation. [30][31][32] Based on a review of the literature at the time of writing, suture tape has not been reported for median sternotomy closure in companion animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent publication reporting on the clinical use of suture tape for sternal closure in humans reported no complications when compared with closure with wire, which had a complication rate of 28.6% requiring surgical intervention 24 . In humans, suture tape applications include rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, ulnar collateral ligament repair, olecranon fracture repair, and patellar fracture repair, among others 25–29 . Suture tape is most commonly used in veterinary medicine as a lateral suture at the stifle and in toggle rod procedures for repair of coxofemoral luxation 30–32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have confirmed that ACL repair has mechanical weaknesses at the suture site, and internal bracing technology can effectively limit the gap expansion at the suture site, reduce the risk of reinjury, and improve the postoperative joint function score. [ 12 , 13 ] In ACL reconstruction, the overall mechanical strength of the tendon graft will decline due to the disintegration of the original collagen fiber in the process of ligamentation, and it will also face the risk of fracture of the mechanical weak point during active rehabilitation. [ 14 , 15 ] In recent years, scholars have studied the feasibility and effectiveness of internal support technologies such as FiberTape TM and InternalBrace TM in ACL reconstruction, and obtained good in vivo and in vitro biomechanical, histological, and clinical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%