2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2013.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical application of amplicon-based next-generation sequencing in cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis consist of a primary analysis, in which the base pairs are called and quality score are generated; a secondary analysis, numerous reads are aligned to the human reference sequence; and a tertiary analysis which consists of variant calling and annotation [117]. Many databases are useful for helping the variant annotation, such as the 1000 Genome Project [118], dbSNP database [119], Clinvar-NCBI [120], LOVD-Leiden Open Variation Database [121], The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [122] and others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This analysis consist of a primary analysis, in which the base pairs are called and quality score are generated; a secondary analysis, numerous reads are aligned to the human reference sequence; and a tertiary analysis which consists of variant calling and annotation [117]. Many databases are useful for helping the variant annotation, such as the 1000 Genome Project [118], dbSNP database [119], Clinvar-NCBI [120], LOVD-Leiden Open Variation Database [121], The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [122] and others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, information from these sources can contain ambiguous and insuicient information. Variants detected should be reported according to Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) recommendations, with information of the human reference genome version and transcript information used to variant description [117]. The reference coding sequence should be preferably from the RefSeq database [123].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of sequencing data per run is 600 Gb, the read lengths are ~100 bp, the cost is lower, and the run times are 3-10 days which are much longer than most other systems. However, this system has some disadvantages including complex data analysis and higher cost of data generation 8,10 .…”
Section: Illumina/solexamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the current error rate of this system is relatively high (3-5%). The main error type is deletion which probably results from detection errors and/or incorporation of unlabeled nucleotides 10 . Other SMS technologies with higher sequencing speed, longer read lengths, or lower overall cost are also emerging.…”
Section: Emerging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation