2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2022.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical application of 3D-printed PEEK implants for repairing mandibular defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the defect site is indirect stress-bearing, which would not cause excessive stress to PEEK. If used for stress-bearing mandibular reconstruction, 23 it is necessary to select patients with relatively low masticatory loads and perform rigorous mechanical analysis. Second, compared with titanium, most bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutants , showed higher activity and adherence on the PEEK surface and were more likely to form biofilms 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the defect site is indirect stress-bearing, which would not cause excessive stress to PEEK. If used for stress-bearing mandibular reconstruction, 23 it is necessary to select patients with relatively low masticatory loads and perform rigorous mechanical analysis. Second, compared with titanium, most bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutants , showed higher activity and adherence on the PEEK surface and were more likely to form biofilms 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After implantation, the surface of the implant has difficulty adhering to cells, resulting in poor bone integration and weak antibacterial performance. These factors significantly impede its clinical application to a large extent . The development of surface engineering provides the possibility of the further development of PEEK as a bioactive implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a tensile strength of 80 MPa and an elastic modulus of nearly 3–4 GPa, the mechanical properties of PEEK are closer to that of the human cortical bone, which has a tensile strength of 104–121 MPa and an elastic modulus of roughly 14 GPa [ 15 ]. PEEK has been used as medical implants in the reconstruction of cranial, mandibular, orthopedic and dental surgeries [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Subtractive manufacturing methods such as computer numerical control (CNC) and injection molding were used to manufacture the PEEK material, but it had many challenges such as material hardening with slightly lower temperatures and a significant amount of wastage [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%