“…While measurements of O 2 in tissues have been recognized as an important factor in the clinical evaluation and treatment of many diseases, especially cancer (Busk, Overgaard, & Horsman, 2020), and pathologies involving ischemia (such as in peripheral vascular disease and wound healing), insufficient attention often has been paid to the meaning of the values that have been obtained. (Note: this review is derived, in part, from a series of recent papers on this topic; Flood et al, 2020; Instead, all too often, when a measurement technique has indicated that the level of O 2 in a given tissue is "X," that is, is some specific quantitative number for the O 2 in the tissue, researchers, and clinicians alike assume that "X" is a reliable, accurate representation of the "true" oxygenation status of the tissue. This approach ignores the complexity and dynamics of O 2 in living biological systems.…”