2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10165-007-0571-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and radiological results of non-cement impaction bone-graft method of total hip arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract: We performed total hip arthroplasty using the non-cement impaction auto-bone-grafting method with the resected femoral head for acetabular protrusion that is not combined with the destruction of acetabular rim or dysplasia of the hip joint. Ten patients (eight women and two men) with rheumatoid arthritis who showed acetabular protrusion underwent total hip arthroplasty using this method. All patients were able to walk with full weight within 5 days after surgery. The short-term results of our cases were very g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the use of allografts, there remains a latent risk of infection with unidentified microorganisms. To avoid the use of allografts and artificial bone, sufficient auto-bone grafting with the resected femoral head can restore the anatomical position of the acetabular rotation center, which can provide good initial stability for acetabular cup fixation, long-term stability and biological fixation [4,5]. Additionally, it also avoids the limitations or expected adverse effects of other methods of bone grafting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the use of allografts, there remains a latent risk of infection with unidentified microorganisms. To avoid the use of allografts and artificial bone, sufficient auto-bone grafting with the resected femoral head can restore the anatomical position of the acetabular rotation center, which can provide good initial stability for acetabular cup fixation, long-term stability and biological fixation [4,5]. Additionally, it also avoids the limitations or expected adverse effects of other methods of bone grafting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%