2023
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Radiological Mid- to Long-term Results Following Triple Arthrodesis

Abstract: Background/Aim: Triple arthrodesis (TA) is a common procedure for stabilization of painful and unstable hind foot deformities. The aim of the study was to analyze postoperative changes in function and pain following isolated TA based on clinical outcomes, radiological findings, and pain scores. The study also considered economic aspects, such as the inability to work, before and after surgery. Patients and Methods: This was a singlecenter retrospective study, with a mean follow-up of 7.8 (range=2.9-12.6) years… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PROM tools, SF-36 and RAND-36 are validated, free to use, QoL devices and have the advantage of being assessed in different diseases (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) In spite of the recent reports, there is a lack of reports regarding patients undergoing Ccy showing their own experiences with the procedure. RAND-36 and SF-36 contain the same set of domains; however, the scoring differed slightly in the domains of GH and BP (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PROM tools, SF-36 and RAND-36 are validated, free to use, QoL devices and have the advantage of being assessed in different diseases (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) In spite of the recent reports, there is a lack of reports regarding patients undergoing Ccy showing their own experiences with the procedure. RAND-36 and SF-36 contain the same set of domains; however, the scoring differed slightly in the domains of GH and BP (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%