2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Radiologic Features of Osteoporotic Spine Fracture with Delayed Neurologic Compromises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the patient's lower back pain was signi cantly relieved, and 10 patients with signi cant nerve injury had a signi cant improvement in postoperative AISA grade. Our results are also consistent with previous reports [3,19]. Part IV patients had local instability of the vertebral body, and the biomechanics of the spine was destroyed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the patient's lower back pain was signi cantly relieved, and 10 patients with signi cant nerve injury had a signi cant improvement in postoperative AISA grade. Our results are also consistent with previous reports [3,19]. Part IV patients had local instability of the vertebral body, and the biomechanics of the spine was destroyed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Due to OVCF is a kind of low-energy damage, and the patient is slow to respond to pain at the old age, which fails to attract enough attention, often leading to delay in the disease, missing the best treatment opportunity, and nally the fracture is changed from a fresh fracture to an old fracture. The most common ones are changes in osteonecrosis, and even kyphosis and nerve compression [3], which seriously affects the quality of life of patients and delays the treatment effect [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] Two of these identified posterior wall involvement as a risk factor. 13,14 Additionally, initial height loss, midportion type fractures, swelled front type as well as dented type fractures in accordance with Sugita et al (Figure 2), complex fracture morphology, development of an intravertebral cleft, fracture instability, fractures at the thoracolumbar junction, and specific MRI changes that will be mentioned later in the text were listed [12][13][14][15][16] Another investigation looked at risk factors for vertebral collapse and spinal canal compromise resulting in neurologic symptoms. 17 They concluded that posterior vertebral body height loss, fracture involvement of both endplates and specific MRI changes conferred higher risk.…”
Section: Fracture-specific Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,16 Risk factors were the following: bow-shaped type fractures, Fracture types with high rates of failure. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] projecting type fractures and swelled front type fractures (Figure 2). Hoshino et al defined poor outcomes either as low physical component scores (SF 36), a low level of independence or high pain levels.…”
Section: Fracture-specific Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of surgery was to relieve nerve compression and restore spinal stability. Previous, Park et al depicted that this surgery was effective in relieving delayed neurologic compromises [19]. Besides, Lee et al had shown that posterior decompression and reduction fusion and internal xation can relieve spinal cord compression and nerve compression [20].…”
Section: Posterior Decompression and Reduction Fusion And Internal Xamentioning
confidence: 99%