Clinical and radiologic comparison of anterior-posterior single-position lateral surgery versus MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Kotani, Yoshihisa; Koike, Yoshinao; Ikeura, Atsushi; Tokunaga, Hitoo; Saito, Takanori

doi:10.1016/j.jos.2020.10.013

Cited by 30 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Literature revealed that the postoperative restoration of DH, SLA, and LLA between OLIF and MI-TLIF is still debatable. 7 , 10 – 13 , 35 A recent meta-analysis 7 demonstrated very similar restoration of DH, SLA, and LLA between OLIF and MI-TLIF. Conversely, several studies 10 – 13 concluded that OLIF is superior to MI-TLIF with regard to the restoration of DH, either in the immediate postoperative period or long-term follow-up but not in the restoration of SLA and LLA.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 7 , 10 – 13 , 35 A recent meta-analysis 7 demonstrated very similar restoration of DH, SLA, and LLA between OLIF and MI-TLIF. Conversely, several studies 10 – 13 concluded that OLIF is superior to MI-TLIF with regard to the restoration of DH, either in the immediate postoperative period or long-term follow-up but not in the restoration of SLA and LLA. We found that OLIF had a distinct advantage over MI-TLIF in terms of the restoration of DH and LLA, both in the immediate postoperative period and long-term follow-up, but not in the case of SLA.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease

Zhu

Fang

Zhao

et al. 2021

Spine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A prospective cohort study is underway to evaluate the difference of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with respect to perioperative data, patient-reported outcomes, radiographic measure, and complications. The results demonstrate surgeons could give preference to OLIF on the basis of a rich experience in lumbar anatomy and lumbar anterior or lateral surgery.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease

Zhu

Fang

Zhao

et al. 2021

Spine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to the different surgical methods of OLIF and TLIF, as well as the different radiological results, whether the impact of fusion on adjacent segments is the same is still unclear. Although Kotani et al [ 21 ] compared the effects of OLIF and MIS-TLIF on adjacent segments, Wang et al [ 22 ] compared the effects of OLIF and TLIF on adjacent segments in biomechanics. However, the studies conducted by the above and others are not particularly detailed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of the effects of OLIF and TLIF on adjacent segments after treatment of L4 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Tong

Wang

2022

J Orthop Surg Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The fusion of the lumbar spine may lead to the degeneration of the adjacent segments. In this study, the effects of OLIF and TLIF on adjacent segments after treatment of L4 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) were compared and analysed. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of the medical records of consecutive patients treated with OLIF or TLIF for L4DLS. They were divided into the OLIF group and TLIF group based on different treatment methods. Cage height, segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were compared between the two groups, and the postoperative biomechanical changes were analysed by establishing the disc angle (DA). The clinical outcomes were analysed by comparing the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASDis) between the two groups. The intervertebral disc height (IDH), intervertebral foramen height (IDH), intervertebral foramen area (IFA), sliding distance (SD), and angular displacement (AD) in L3-4 and L5-S1 were compared between the two groups. The incidence of aggravated disc degeneration (ADD), the incidence of aggravated zygapophyseal joint degeneration (AJD) and the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) were compared between the two groups for radiological degeneration. Results At the last follow-up, there was one case of ASDis in the OLIF group (2.78%) and two cases in the TLIF group (5.56%). At the last follow-up, compared with the preoperative values, IDH, IFH, and IFA of the adjacent segments above and below L4-5 decreased in both groups (P < 0.05); the SD and AD increased in both groups (P < 0.05). The cage height and L4-5 IDH in the OLIF group were significantly higher than those in the TLIF group (P < 0.05). SL, LL, PT, SS, and L5- S1DA were significantly improved in the OLIF group compared with the TLIF group (P < 0.05). The incidence of L3-4ASDeg in the two groups was higher than that of L5-S1. The incidence of ASDeg and the incidence of L5-S1ADD in the OLIF group were lower than those in the TLIF group, but the incidence of L5-S1AJD was higher than that in the TLIF group. Conclusion L4DLS after OLIF and TLIF treatment will cause adjacent segment degeneration, and L3-4 degeneration is more obvious than L5-S1 degeneration. OLIF has more advantages in restoring lumbar sagittal balance. Compared with TLIF, OLIF can weaken the degeneration of the L5-S1 disc and increase the degeneration of the L5-S1 zygapophyseal joints.

show abstract

“…There are various surgical procedures for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, including endoscopic TLIF [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) by indirect decompression [ 13 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], as well as MIS-TLIF. Currently, there are a few reports comparing MIS-TLIF with LIF [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. MIS-TLIF can cope with various pathological conditions and is an indispensable procedure for cases that require direct decompression [ 28 , 30 , 33 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Posterior Oblique Square Decompression with a Three-Step Wanding Technique in Tubular Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Report and Mid-Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Tomita

Kamei

Yamauchi

et al. 2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is the most common procedure in minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt), details of the technique remain unclear. This technical report shows the mid-long-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent posterior oblique square decompression (POSDe) with the three-step wanding technique of tubular MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar disease. Tubular MIS-TLIF (POSDe) was performed on 50 patients (males, 19; age, 69.2 ± 9.6 years), and traditional open surgery was performed (OS) on 27 (males, 4; age, 67.9 ± 6.6 years). We evaluated the clinical outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale for back pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. We also assessed the fusion rate using the Bridwell grading system with computed tomography or plain radiography for at least 2 years postoperatively. Although there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA scores between the two groups, the mean operation time and blood loss were significantly lower with MIS-TLIF than with OS. In the tubular MIS-TLIF group, there were no cases of deep wound infection; four cases had a pseudarthrosis, two had dural injury, and three had cage retropulsion. We revealed good clinical outcomes in patients who underwent POSDe.

show abstract

Clinical and radiologic comparison of anterior-posterior single-position lateral surgery versus MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Cited by 30 publications

References 18 publications

Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease

Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease

Comparative analysis of the effects of OLIF and TLIF on adjacent segments after treatment of L4 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Posterior Oblique Square Decompression with a Three-Step Wanding Technique in Tubular Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Report and Mid-Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About